Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.28102

Polyscene: Scenario Planning as Diversity Planning

Mustafa F. Abdelwahed·Joan Espasa·Felipe Meneguzzi
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Scenario planning is a foresight practice in which analysts construct a small set of plausible futures and prepare an organisation for each. Each scenario is a narrative that must be plausible, internally consistent, relevant and challenging, and the set as a whole must be differentiated. The practice remains manual: a workshop (i.e., a facilitated meeting in which a small group of experts writes the narratives) considers only the factors it has time for, carries the biases of the experts who run it, and cannot be redone whenever conditions change. In this paper, we automate scenario planning by casting it as a diversity planning problem, in which two scenarios differ when they end in different narratives on the analyst's drivers. The result is a set of scenarios, one for each narrative that the topic can reach within a budget. Our implementation, Polyscene, is a generic engine that generates scenarios from a topic. We use geopolitical conflicts and shipping-route disruptions as case studies. For the first, we build the planning problem's initial state from the GDELT Project so it reflects current relationships among the countries involved. Polyscene then generates scenarios showing how relationships among those countries change. With a board of six countries as of 1 January 2021 and a budget of five events, the conflict set puts five of the 15 country pairs at war, and each of the three wars that break out among these countries by 1 January 2026 ends a scenario. For the second, we build the initial state from ship traffic, a supply-pressure index, and the news, and Polyscene generates scenarios showing what a closed or diverted route could do to a manufacturer's parts stock. With four routes per board and the same date and budget, each set includes three outcomes, and the Suez Canal set includes the March 2021 blockage and the December 2023 Red Sea container diversion.

Explore related subjects

cs.AI

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Mustafa F. Abdelwahed, Joan Espasa, Felipe Meneguzzi. 2026-10-20. Polyscene: Scenario Planning as Diversity Planning. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.28102

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Adaptive auditing of AI systems with anytime-valid guarantees

A major bottleneck in characterizing the failure modes of generative AI systems is the cost and time of annotation and evaluation. Consequently, adaptive testing paradigms have gained popularity, where one opportunistically decides which cases and how many to annotate based on past results. While this framework is highly practical, its extreme flexibility makes it difficult to draw statistically rigorous conclusions, as it violates classical assumptions: the number of observations is typically limited (often 10 to 50 cases) and decisions regarding sampling and stopping are made in the midst of data collection rather than based a pre-specified rule. To characterize what statistical inferences can be drawn from highly adaptive audits, we introduce a hypothesis testing framework from two "dueling" perspectives: (i) the model's null that asserts there is no failure mode with performance below a target threshold versus (ii) the auditor's null that asserts they have a sampling strategy that will uncover a failure mode. Leveraging Safe Anytime-Valid Inference (SAVI), we formalize the auditor as conducting "testing by betting," which translates into simultaneous e-processes for testing the dueling null hypotheses. Furthermore, if the auditor is sufficiently powerful, we prove that these two hypotheses are asymptotically inverses of each other, in that passage of such an audit certifies the AI system as being globally robust. Empirically, we demonstrate that our proposed testing procedures maintain anytime-valid Type-I error control, outperform pre-specified testing methods, and can reach statistically rigorous conclusions sometimes with as few as 20 observations.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

WindINR: Latent-State INR for Fast Local Wind Query and Correction in Complex Terrain

Many decisions in complex terrain require fast wind estimates at specific locations and heights rather than dense forecasts on fixed grids. We present WindINR, a latent-state implicit neural representation framework for continuous high-resolution local wind queries and correction using sparse observations. A latent-conditioned decoder maps terrain descriptors, a low-resolution background field, and continuous query coordinates to local wind estimates. WindINR separates reusable representation learning from sample-specific latent correction. During training, a privileged encoder infers reference latent states from high-resolution supervision, while a deployable predictor estimates initial states from inference-time inputs. Their discrepancies define a dataset-adaptive Gaussian prior over latent corrections. At inference time, network weights remain fixed, and only the latent state is updated through a regularized objective incorporating sparse observations and their uncertainty. We train WindINR on the large-scale FuXi-CFD dataset and evaluate it using controlled observing system simulation experiments, simulated helicopter trajectories, and real UAV measurements over Tromsø. Across these settings, sparse-observation assimilation consistently improves local wind predictions, with WindINR outperforming several baselines, including WindSeer. Updating only a low-dimensional latent state yields a 14-fold speedup over full-network fine-tuning while preserving continuous queries at arbitrary spatial coordinates. WindINR thus provides an efficient interface between kilometer-scale background products, sparse local observations, and local wind queries in complex terrain.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

DeepLook: Uncertainty-Guided Branching with Lookahead Confidence for Efficient Reasoning

Test-time scaling improves large language model reasoning, but spends compute uniformly along a reasoning trace, even in stretches that are already stable. Motivated by the observation that reasoning failures show an early onset of uncertainty, we introduce DeepLook, a training-free decoding framework that monitors segment-level confidence, branches only at uncertainty bottlenecks, and ranks candidate continuations by Average Lookahead Confidence (ALC)---their mean confidence over fixed-horizon rollouts---before completing and voting over a pruned subset. On four competition mathematics benchmarks across four open models, DeepLook matches or exceeds the accuracy of DeepConf-low in 12 of 16 settings while generating 87.3% fewer tokens, showing that a model's own confidence is informative enough to decide where extra decoding compute is worth spending. On knowledge-intensive GPQA-Diamond the accuracy advantage disappears even though the token saving does not: coherent hallucinations also receive high ALC, so internal confidence localizes instability, not falsehood. Code is available at https://github.com/txyang1/deeplook.

cs.AI↗