Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.29221

Policy Learning with Network-Shaping Assignments

Abstract

Many policies determine social arrangements whose effects depend on the relationships formed afterwards. We study how to learn such policies when a constrained joint action changes network formation and outcomes depend on exposures to the resulting network. Policy value integrates an outcome response over the distribution of post-assignment networks. The large number of feasible arrangements makes it difficult to evaluate policies directly from historical data. We therefore adopt a model-based approach that pools information across assignments to evaluate alternative arrangements. We characterize identification of policy values and construct plug-in estimators. Our regret bounds account for sampling variation, first-stage estimation error, and computational errors. Our applications to classroom seating and business groups illustrate predicted welfare gains from learned rules relative to random assignment.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Zhenxiao Chen, Zhiheng You. 2026-10-21. Policy Learning with Network-Shaping Assignments. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.29221

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

The Anatomy of Dependence in Multivariate Ordered Choice

When individuals make simultaneous decisions across multiple ordered dimensions, standard multivariate ordered choice models impose narrow bracketing, with each dimension decided as if the others did not exist. We develop a general rectangular structure model capturing broad bracketing while nesting the standard model. The framework introduces two layers of dependence, one through the threshold structure associated with decision rules and the other through the correlation of latent utilities. We provide microfoundations, prove identification, and discuss estimation. We showcase the model in applications to parental investment in children's education, cryptocurrency familiarity and expectations, and health insurance, where the latter separates moral hazard from adverse selection.

econ.EM↗

Marital Sorting, Household Inequality and Selection

Using CPS data for 1976 to 2025, we explore how wage inequality has evolved for married couples with both spouses working full time full year, and its impact on household income inequality. We also investigate how marriage sorting patterns have changed over this period. To determine the factors driving income inequality we estimate a model explaining the joint distribution of couples' wages that accounts for spouses' employment decisions. This requires a multivariate distribution regression model that incorporates a double selection rule. We find that income inequality has increased for these households and increased wage sorting has exacerbated the inequality resulting from individual wage growth. We find that positive sorting partially reflects the correlation across unobservables influencing the wages of both members of the marriage. We decompose the changes in sorting patterns over the 50-year sample into structural, composition and selection effects and find that the increase in positive sorting primarily reflects the increased skill premia for both observed and unobserved characteristics.

econ.EM↗

Evaluating A/B Testing Methodologies via Sample Splitting: Theory and Practice

We develop a theoretical framework for sample splitting in A/B testing environments, where data for each test are partitioned into two splits to measure methodological performance when the true impacts of tests are unobserved. We show that sample-split estimators are generally biased for full-sample performance but consistently estimate sample-split analogues of it. We derive their asymptotic distributions, construct valid confidence intervals, and characterize the bias-variance trade-offs underlying sample-split design choices. We validate our theoretical results through simulations and provide implementation guidance for A/B testing products seeking to evaluate new estimators and decision rules.

econ.EM↗