Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2610.34026

Designing sustainability under Earth-system rate constraints

Abstract

Sustainability debates are monopolized by quantities: total energy use, material stocks, or recycling volumes. These metrics are informative, but they obscure a more fundamental constraint. On a materially closed but energetically open Earth, long-term viability is governed by rates: power density, areal power density, and the rate at which dispersed materials can be repurified under dif- fuse solar fluxes. We develop a physical framework that links technological metabolism, material dilution, and recycling limits through these rate con- straints. This perspective clarifies why many contemporary technologies remain viable only through stock drawdown and high-power buffering, and why green growth strategies often shift rather than resolve the underlying mismatch between industrial activity and Earth-system dynamics. We argue that long-term sustain- ability requires both quantitative reduction in aggregate industrial throughput toward rate-bounded regimes and the development of technologies qualitatively compatible with biospheric operating conditions.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

José Halloy, Petros Chatzimpiros, François Graner, Thomas Gregor. 2026-10-25. Designing sustainability under Earth-system rate constraints. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.34026

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

From First Principles to Multi-scale Decomposition: Mutual Information as a Segregation Index

Segregation operates across demographic and spatial scales and requires careful and principled measurement. In this work, we derive mutual information from well-known general approaches to constructing segregation indices and interpret the mathematical properties that are unique to it. The properties relate mainly to its behaviour when demographic identities and spatial units are coarse-grained. Mutual information decomposes into the contributions of regions and supergroups, which reveals insights that would be inaccessible otherwise. We demonstrate this with an exploratory case study of residential ethnic segregation in England and Wales. Overall, we help researchers identify when mutual information is the only suitable segregation index and provide open source software to support multi-scale analysis.

physics.soc-ph↗

Competitive exploration in structured environments

Organisms must constantly weigh exploiting the resources they know against exploring for better ones. When foragers compete, the best behavior for each forager also depends on what its competitors do. How does competition change the strategic balance between exploration and exploitation? Here we address this question in a minimal model: two $ε$-greedy temporal-difference learners on a one-dimensional lattice, who start at a small reward at one end and are unaware of a larger reward at the other. For a lone forager, the optimal exploration rate increases monotonically with the value of the distant reward, and with its distance up to a critical distance. When two foragers share the lattice and split rewards, the choice of exploration rate becomes a game whose Nash equilibria have both foragers exploring, both staying, or one exploring while the other stays (anti-coordination). Under local best-response dynamics, pairs of foragers often converge on both exploring or both staying, even when anti-coordination would be socially optimal. This social dilemma arises for a wide range of parameters, and it persists even in a simplified model without explicit spatial structure. A minimal, naturalistic signal, in which one forager informs the other that it has found the distant reward, can remove many of the dilemmas in which both foragers explore, and can produce a Nash equilibrium whose collective payoff exceeds that of every outcome available without signaling.

physics.soc-ph↗

From AI-assisted to AI-native Industrial Control: Architecture, Agent Design, and Challenges

The integration of AI and industrial control is rapidly transforming industrial automation. However, current approaches remain predominantly AI-assisted, where AI functions are incorporated as auxiliary components without fundamentally altering the underlying architecture of industrial control systems. Consequently, the potential of AI to enable higher levels of autonomy, adaptability, and continuous evolution remains underutilized. This paper proposes an AI-native industrial control paradigm, which reconceptualizes industrial control systems by positioning AI as the intrinsic core rather than an external enhancement. The proposed paradigm is built upon an AI-native infrastructure and a collection of collaborative agentic AIs, each encapsulating a set of advanced skills. Among them, the industrial control agent plays a central role in orchestrating the system lifecycle. Through this paradigm, industrial control shifts from a closed, capability-oriented, human-driven, and passive engineering process to an open, task-oriented, intent-driven, and autonomous solution delivery mechanism. The paper further analyzes the key challenges of the AI-native paradigm from both AI and industrial control perspectives, including issues related to AI model reliability, formal verification, real-time assurance, and heterogeneous resource orchestration. Overall, this work outlines a forward-looking vision for industrial control in the AI era and identifies critical research directions toward autonomous, evolvable, and adaptive control systems in complex and dynamic industrial environments.

physics.soc-ph↗