Cordon Tolls and Urban Traffic Volumes: Evidence from NYC's 2025 Congestion Relief Zone

Yash Prajapati

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.34818

Cordon Tolls and Urban Traffic Volumes: Evidence from NYC's 2025 Congestion Relief Zone

Yash Prajapati

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

On January 5, 2025, New York City became the first U.S. city to operate a permanent cordon-based congestion toll, charging vehicles entering Manhattan's Central Business District (the Congestion Relief Zone, or CRZ). This study estimates the short-run causal effect of the toll on hourly traffic volumes using a two-way fixed-effects difference in-differences (TWFE-DiD) strategy that compares treated CRZ street segments to untreated Manhattan segments north of 60th Street. The empirical analysis exploits hourly entry counts from the MTA's toll-meter system (4.86 million ten-minute-block records) as the primary descriptive panel and high-frequency NYC DOT Automated Traffic Recorder (ATR) data as the within-segment identification panel. The headline TWFE-DiD point estimate indicates a 40 to 45 percent reduction in log hourly volume at treated CRZ locations, with the effect direction consistent across nine pre-registered alternative specifications and concentrated in peak hours. East River bridges in the balanced panel exhibit a statistically significant 25 percent post-period increase in volume, consistent with route substitution.

Explore related subjects

econ.EM

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Yash Prajapati. 2026-10-26. Cordon Tolls and Urban Traffic Volumes: Evidence from NYC's 2025 Congestion Relief Zone. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.34818

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Instrumented Difference-in-Differences with Heterogeneous Treatment Effects

Many studies exploit variation in the timing of policy adoption across units as an instrument for treatment. This paper formalizes the underlying identification strategy as a staggered instrumented difference-in-differences (DID-IV). In this design, a Wald-DID estimand, which scales the DID estimand of the outcome by the DID estimand of the treatment, captures the cohort specific local average treatment effect on the treated (CLATT). We propose a credible estimation method in this design that is robust to treatment effect heterogeneity. We also provide simultaneous inference procedures based on the multiplier bootstrap. We illustrate the empirical relevance of our findings, estimating returns to schooling in the United Kingdom. In this application, the two-way fixed effects instrumental variable regression, the conventional approach to implement DID-IV designs, yields a negative estimate. By contrast, our estimation method indicates a substantial gain from schooling.

econ.EM↗

arXiv2026

Bias-robust causal inference for panel data

We develop a bias-robust framework for causal inference in panel data models with interactive fixed effects. Conventional imputation-based estimators of average treatment effects on the treated do not explicitly account for counterfactual approximation error, potentially leading to misleading inference. Building on bias-aware minimax methods, we construct an estimator that corrects imputed counterfactuals using weighted untreated residuals and delivers confidence intervals with an explicit allowance for the remaining approximation bias. The resulting framework separates protection against approximation bias from the efficiency gains obtained through optimal correction. In simulations, the correction reduces confidence interval length by approximately 13\% relative to bias-aware inference without correction, while preserving empirical coverage. An application to Election Day Registration demonstrates how the correction strengthens the robustness of substantive conclusions to counterfactual error. The proposed approach provides a transparent sensitivity analysis for causal effects when the accuracy of counterfactual imputation cannot be established from observed data alone.

econ.EM↗

arXiv2026

Regression Adjustment for Ratios of Treatment Effects in Randomized Experiments

We study regression adjustment for ratios of treatment effects in completely randomized experiments. The existing literature adjusts the numerator and denominator separately, but this approach misses the efficiency target, loss of which matters more when richer or high-dimensional covariate information and flexible or regularized prediction methods are used to pursue further efficiency gains. We propose a two-step estimator that directly predicts the relevant transformed outcome. Using cross-fitting, our method accommodates high-dimensional first-stage prediction while keeping the final adjustment fixed-dimensional, thereby avoiding instability from a growing number of adjustment covariates. We further develop persistence-based LASSO theory that does not require sparsity, permits more covariates than observations, and allows cross-validated penalty selection under prediction-level conditions. For additional efficiency gains, our augmented two-step estimator nests the benchmark adjustment spaces and is therefore asymptotically no less efficient than the benchmark estimators, while its feasible conservative variance estimator satisfies the same efficiency ordering. Simulation studies and a real-data analysis demonstrate that our proposed estimator performs better than existing methods.

econ.EM↗