Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.38426

The Code Behind the Layout: AI Agents for Analog Layout Generators

Minxing Chu·Anhang Li·Martins Atilla·Ruichen Qi·Mehdi Saligane
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Analog layout remains largely manual and hard to automate. Generator frameworks such as gLayout express layouts as programs, producing layouts from parameterized, design-rule-aware generators; however, writing such generators still takes expert effort. Large language models (LLMs) could now write generator code, and frontier models can even draw layout geometry from design intent. This raises a practical question: if a model can draw the layout itself, what does a generator framework still contribute, and is applying these models to a generator framework better than having them draw a layout from scratch? Through controlled experiments on gLayout in SKY130, we find that the main obstacle to drawing a layout directly is its time and token cost, and that the main advantage of a model building on a generator framework is reusability. Its verified primitives keep each model edit small enough to check, and its parameters allow a single edit to be evaluated across an entire family of layouts. Accordingly, a model is most effective when it develops the layout from the generator source of the family that the design intent belongs to, and tests each edit on the family members most likely to fail, so that one verified change improves every layout the generator produces. The results of these family tests can then serve as supervision for a local model, which learns edits that hold across the family at a fraction of the inference cost.

Explore related subjects

cs.ARcs.AI

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Minxing Chu, Anhang Li, Martins Atilla, Ruichen Qi, Mehdi Saligane. 2026-10-28. The Code Behind the Layout: AI Agents for Analog Layout Generators. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38426

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Energy-Efficient FPGA Implementation of an End-to-End Cosine-Domain CNN Using High-Level Synthesis

The computational cost of conventional Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) limits their deployment in low-power devices for high-speed edge AI applications. This paper presents an end-to-end cosine-domain CNN (CD-CNN) architecture for energy-efficient FPGA inference using high-level synthesis (HLS). The proposed architecture performs intermediate feature extraction using real-valued DCT-domain representations, avoiding complex-valued arithmetic and intermediate inverse transforms between spectral layers. The design is implemented on a Xilinx Kintex UltraScale+ XCKU5P FPGA and evaluated against a fully spectral Fourier-domain CNN (FD-CNN) under consistent network and implementation constraints. Experiments on the MNIST and 94-class ASCII datasets show that the CD-CNN reduces normalized resource utilization and improves inference throughput on both datasets. Its energy efficiency reaches 112.91 frames/J for MNIST and 101.27 frames/J for ASCII, corresponding to improvements of $1.51\times$ and $2.76\times$, respectively, over the fully spectral FD-CNN architecture. Furthermore, compared to the previous GPU-based fully spectral CD-CNN implementation, the proposed end-to-end FPGA implementation improves energy efficiency by $12.96\times$. These results demonstrate the potential of real-valued spectral processing in the DCT domain for energy-efficient edge AI deployment.

cs.AR↗
arXiv2026

Learning to Formulate: Agentic Hardware-Software Co-Design of AI Infrastructure through Progressive Optimization and Verification

AI infrastructure, the chips and software that train and serve AI models, is designed in layers. Layers make the system manageable, but they also fix which choices an optimizer can consider. Gains that need the chip and its software to change together are excluded before optimization begins: the formulation leaves them out. Language-model agents make it possible to revisit these boundaries, but an agent's proposal cannot show by itself that a design is correct or optimal. We present Formulaic, a flow that divides the work. The agent writes the formulation, a mathematical solver optimizes within it, and verification and measurement check its assumptions and results. The agent refines the problem step by step, from the computation graph toward the chip. Each step is a template: a family of programs with the conditions under which they are correct. Wall relaxation searches the chip by pricing the hardware limits that bind the software. This paper takes a first step, through separate studies rather than one end-to-end run. On NVIDIA GB10, templates the agent wrote run complete Qwen3-8B layers $1.075\times$ faster than SGLang. In a simulated Ventus GPU study, joint design cuts the worst-scenario cycles of Qwen2.5-0.5B to 0.428 of the reference, against 0.934 for software alone. On a five-step GEMM refinement chain, reusing proofs makes checking $2.51\times$ faster.

cs.AR↗
arXiv2026

OPERA: OPamp Design by an Expert-Taught Reasoning Agent, from Specifications to Layout

Analog flows from specifications to a signed-off layout rarely run without manual iteration. Recent large language model (LLM) agents size circuits with optimizer loops over the device dimensions and stop at the schematic. We present OPERA (OPamp design by an Expert-taught Reasoning Agent), in which a general-purpose LLM agent designs CMOS opamps from specifications to post-layout sign-off with open-source tools. First, the designer teaches the agent the gm/ID method: map the specifications to transconductances and minimum currents, choose gm/ID per device role from characterized lookup tables, and size from equations, leaving a few knobs to search and an explainable design. Second, the agent learns the gLayout framework and taught layout practice, and writes a reusable layout generator that closes the layout and extraction loop at designer-approved gates. In SKY130, the agent designed a shared constant-gm bias and six opamps (5T, folded-cascode and telescopic OTAs; Miller, folded-cascode and telescopic two-stage) for fun >= 50 MHz, PM >= 60 degrees, SR 25 V/μs into 1 pF and a minimum dc gain of 30 to 60 dB. All six layouts are DRC-clean and LVS-matched, and their extracted netlists meet every target at all 15 PVT corners ( fun >= 53.7 MHz, PM >= 62.1 degrees, SR >= 27.9 V/μs). The benchmark netlists are released at https://github.com/AMPICLab/AMPICBench.

cs.AR↗