Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2610.38896

The Hidden Value of Soft Infrastructure for Urban Flood Adaptation

Lidia Cano Pecharroman·ChangHoon Hahn
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

As sea level rises and flooding events become more frequent, cities are tapping into a range of engineering and planning solutions to reduce flood losses. Beyond traditional ``hard'' infrastructure (e.g., sewage, seawalls), ``soft'' infrastructure that supports and empowers the role of citizens in preparedness has been hailed as a promising avenue for improving adaptation. Despite its promise, there have been very limited attempts to quantify its effectiveness in reducing losses relative to hard infrastructure, particularly in urban environments. This study fills this knowledge gap using generative AI to quantify the effectiveness of a range of hard and soft infrastructure in urban areas. We demonstrate, for the first time, that soft infrastructure can significantly reduce flood losses, with an impact on par with hard infrastructure. Our results open the door to novel ways of confronting adaptation challenges in cities. Soft infrastructure is a viable alternative, especially when budgetary or time constraints make hard infrastructure unattainable. Policymakers should also couple soft and hard infrastructure to maximize resilience.

Explore related subjects

econ.EMstat.AP

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Lidia Cano Pecharroman, ChangHoon Hahn. 2026-10-28. The Hidden Value of Soft Infrastructure for Urban Flood Adaptation. https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38896

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

From Many Models, One: Macroeconomic Forecasting with Reservoir Ensembles

Model combination offers an alternative to selecting a single forecasting model, particularly when individual models are sensitive to random initialization and hyperparameter choices. We study online aggregation through Follow-the-Leader (FTL) and Hedge-type algorithms, with an application to ensembles of Multi-Frequency Echo State Networks (MFESNs) for macroeconomic forecasting. On the theoretical side, we derive Hoeffding- and Bernstein-type expected-regret bounds for FTL and decreasing Hedge under independent and $φ$-mixing expert losses. Under a positive gap between the best expert's expected loss and those of its competitors, the bounds are uniform in the number of forecasting rounds and exhibit logarithmic dependence on the number of experts. Monte Carlo experiments investigate the effects of temporal dependence and the separation between experts' expected losses. Empirically, we construct MFESN ensembles for forecasting U.S. quarterly GDP growth using mixed-frequency macroeconomic and financial indicators. The results show that adaptive aggregation, particularly FTL and AdaHedge, achieves substantial reductions in out-of-sample mean squared forecasting error relative to individual MFESN models and conventional forecast combinations.

econ.EM↗
arXiv2026

Welfare at Risk: Distributionally Robust Bounds for Policy Evaluation

This paper develops a framework to study how the welfare effects of policy interventions are distributed across individuals when those effects are not directly observed. We bound the superquantile of individual welfare changes by the superquantile of conditional average welfare changes, which is typically identified, revealing how gains and losses are spread across the population. We also bound the share of the population whose welfare loss from the policy exceeds any given threshold --- a distribution-free counterpart to average cost--benefit analysis, closer to a poverty-rate measure of policy harm than to a mean welfare effect. We further extend both bounds to allow for ambiguity in the analyst's knowledge of the distribution of observable characteristics: a non-robust bound estimated on one population can be systematically overoptimistic when applied to a different target population, while the robust version, with its ambiguity radius chosen commensurate with the shift, restores a valid guarantee. We illustrate the method in generalized Roy models with subjective participation costs, bounding not only the distribution of welfare changes in the overall population but also, in a result new to this literature, the entire distribution of welfare (and of participation costs) among those who select into treatment --- the treatment-on-the-treated distribution, not merely its mean. We connect these results to the multi-outcome IV framework of \cite{Heckman_Urzua_Vytlacil_2006_REStat}, showing our robust bounds are immune to the instrument-sensitivity problem they document

econ.EM↗
arXiv2026

Inference with Granular Instruments in Large Panels

I develop asymptotic theory for Granular Instrumental Variables (GIV) in large panels with both cross-section ($N$) and sample size ($T$) growing. The granular instrument is constructed from individual shocks that must be estimated from the panel. I show that this estimation has a first-order effect on the asymptotic variance of the GIV estimator. Existing methods do not account for this effect, leading to incorrect standard errors and invalid inference. I derive corrected standard errors that deliver valid inference. I show that instrument strength can change as the cross section grows. This yields strong, nearly-weak, and weak regimes for GIV. In particular, I identify a previously uncharacterized nearly-weak regime in which the instrument vanishes asymptotically, but GIV remains valid. In this regime, if the sample size grows sufficiently fast relative to the cross section, the estimator remains consistent and asymptotically normal at a rate slower than $\sqrt{T}$. Further, I characterize the conditions where GIV exhibits standard weak-instrument behavior and provide Anderson-Rubin confidence intervals. I apply the theory to estimate short-run demand and supply elasticities for copper, natural gas, and crude oil. Across the six elasticities, accounting for instrument estimation changes standard errors by up to a fifth.

econ.EM↗