Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2611.05073

Toward Constant-Factor Maximin Share Guarantees for Subadditive Valuations

Abstract

For $n$ agents and $m$ indivisible goods, an agent's maximin share (MMS) is the largest minimum bundle value she can obtain by partitioning the goods into $n$ bundles. Constant MMS approximations are known for additive, submodular, or XOS valuations, but whether such a guarantee exists for general subadditive valuations remains open. We advance this question in two directions. For general subadditive valuations, we exponentially improve the guarantee from $Ω(1/\log\log n)$ to $Ω(1/\log^* n)$, where $\log^* n$ is the iterated logarithm. We then seek constant MMS guarantees under additional structure on subadditive valuations by studying $q$-partitioning valuations: every partition of a bundle into at most $q$ groups admits nonnegative group prices that sum to the bundle's value and whose sum on any collection of groups is at most the value of their union. This hierarchy ranges from subadditivity at $q=2$ to XOS for $q\ge m$. We give the first study of MMS in the intermediate classes and prove constant guarantees whenever $q/n$ has a fixed positive lower bound, including $1/6$ for $q\ge n$ and $1/4$ for $q\ge2n$. For XOS valuations, we further improve the universal guarantee from $4/17\approx 0.2353$ to $5/16=0.3125$. For subadditive valuations, we prove a bidding amplification theorem that gives an exponential bound on each agent's probability of receiving less than half her MMS, while satisfying her budget in every outcome. For $q$-partitioning valuations, we give a scalar criterion that converts bounds on the value lost from disjoint deletions within a bundle into bounds on potential losses, even when an agent contributes zero below the target bundle value. For XOS valuations, we prove a reservation theorem that selects goods for integral assignment together with auxiliary additive valuations and accounts for the loss in rounding.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Bo Li, Ankang Sun. 2026-11-03. Toward Constant-Factor Maximin Share Guarantees for Subadditive Valuations. https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.05073

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Project Submission Games in Participatory Budgeting

We introduce the framework of project submission games, capturing the behavior of project proposers in participatory budgeting (and multiwinner elections). Here, each proposer submits a subset of project proposals, aiming at maximizing the total cost of those that get funded. We focus on finding conditions under which pure Nash equilibria (NE) exist in our games, and on the complexity of checking whether they exist. We also seek algorithms for computing best responses for the proposers

cs.GT↗

Domination-Avoiding Learning Agents Cannot Collude

An influential paper of Calvano et al. empirically demonstrated that Q-learning agents spontaneously collude when placed as sellers that compete on prices in a natural market model. More recent results of Fish et al. empirically demonstrated that similar collusion happens with commercial LLMs. We formally prove that such collusion can also happen with external-regret-minimizing agents. We identify a very general class of agents, which we term Domination-Avoiding agents, that provably do not collude in such markets. This class contains all Mean-Based agents and all internal-regret-minimizing agents, as well as others such as Multiplicative-Weight agents with variable learning rate and contextual variants thereof. More generally we show that, in any game, this class of agents is guaranteed to jointly learn to almost never play strategies that are eliminated by repeated elimination of purely dominated strategies.

cs.GT↗

Settling the Complexity of Hylland--Zeckhauser Equilibria

The Hylland--Zeckhauser (HZ) mechanism is a foundational framework for allocating indivisible goods in one-sided matching markets via lotteries supported by competitive prices and equal artificial budgets. We resolve the exact computational complexity of the HZ scheme by proving that computing an exact HZ equilibrium is FIXP-complete, thereby settling a conjecture of Vazirani and Yannakakis. Notably, this hardness persists even when computing the equilibrium allocation alone. We establish our hardness result via a reduction that encodes quadratic fixed-point equations into a reciprocal variational inequality. On the algorithmic side, we present a deterministic polynomial-time approximation algorithm that achieves an additive error of $0.0755211 + δ$ for any $δ> 0$, significantly improving upon the previous $1/e$ guarantee.

cs.GT↗