arXiv · 2611.05706
Neural networks and games
Abstract
Hopfield neural networks and noncooperative games provide seemingly different approaches to understanding how collective outcomes emerge from local interactions. In a neural network, individual units adjust their states according to local signals; in a game, players choose actions to maximise individual payoffs. I establish an exact equivalence between symmetric binary Hopfield networks and binary-action games that admit a quadratic potential. The equivalence identifies stable network configurations with pure-strategy Nash equilibria, and asynchronous neural updating with best-response dynamics. More broadly, the storage and retrieval of memories in neural networks correspond, respectively, to the design and selection of equilibria in games.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Philip R. Neary. 2026-11-03. Neural networks and games. https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.05706
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.