A Systematic Benchmark for Evaluating Multimodal Personalized Reasoning of Vision-Language Models

Dohyun Kim; Junyong Lhim; Kwanyong Park

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2611.06259

A Systematic Benchmark for Evaluating Multimodal Personalized Reasoning of Vision-Language Models

Dohyun Kim·Junyong Lhim·Kwanyong Park

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

People often make decisions by holistically reasoning over heterogeneous forms of personal information. In this paper, we study the relatively underexplored capability of multimodal personalized reasoning in multimodal large language models (MLLMs). To this end, we introduce \texttt{MPRBench}, a novel and comprehensive benchmark specifically designed to evaluate personalized reasoning across a wide range of tasks and real-world challenges. \texttt{MPRBench} consists of 12 sub-tasks and additionally supports interpretable analysis of representative error cases. Through extensive experiments, we find that current personalized MLLMs still struggle with personalized reasoning due to several key challenges, including inaccurate recognition of personalized concepts and sensitivity to irrelevant personal information. We hope that MPRBench will stimulate further research on personalized reasoning in MLLMs. Code and data are available at https://github.com/kkdh15/MPRBench

Explore related subjects

cs.AI cs.CV

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Dohyun Kim, Junyong Lhim, Kwanyong Park. 2026-11-04. A Systematic Benchmark for Evaluating Multimodal Personalized Reasoning of Vision-Language Models. https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06259

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Towards Shutdownable Agents via Stochastic Choice

The POST-Agents Proposal (PAP) is an idea for ensuring that advanced artificial agents never resist shutdown. A key part of the PAP is using a novel `Discounted Reward for Same-Length Trajectories (DReST)' reward function to train agents to (1) pursue goals effectively conditional on each trajectory-length (be `USEFUL'), and (2) choose stochastically between different trajectory-lengths (be `NEUTRAL' about trajectory-lengths). In this paper, we propose evaluation metrics for USEFULNESS and NEUTRALITY. We use a DReST reward function to train simple agents to navigate gridworlds, and we find that these agents learn to be USEFUL and NEUTRAL. Our results thus provide some initial evidence that DReST reward functions could train advanced agents to be USEFUL and NEUTRAL. Our theoretical work suggests that these agents would be useful and shutdownable.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

Depth-Recurrent Attention Mixture (Dreamer): Giving Latent Reasoning the Attention it Deserves

Depth-recurrence facilitates latent reasoning by sharing parameters across depths. However, prior work lacks combined FLOP-, parameter-, and memory-matched baselines, underutilizes depth-recurrence due to partially fixed layer stacks, and ignores the bottleneck of constant hidden-sizes that restricts many-step latent reasoning. To address this, we introduce a modular framework of depth-recurrent attention mixtures (Dreamer), combining sequence attention, depth attention, and sparse expert attention. It alleviates the hidden-size bottleneck through attention along depth, decouples scaling dimensions, and allows depth-recurrent models to scale efficiently and effectively. Across language reasoning benchmarks, our models require 2 to 8x fewer training tokens for the same accuracy as FLOP-, parameter-, and memory-matched SOTA, and outperform ca. 2x larger SOTA models with the same training tokens. We further present insights into knowledge usage across depths, e.g., showing 2 to 11x larger expert selection diversity than SOTA MoEs.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

ASTRA-bench: Evaluating Tool-Use Agent Reasoning and Action Planning with Personal User Context

Next-generation AI must manage vast personal data, diverse tools, and multi-step reasoning, yet most benchmarks remain context-free and single-turn. We present ASTRA-bench (Assistant Skills in Tool-use, Reasoning \& Action-planning), a benchmark that uniquely unifies time-evolving personal context with an interactive toolbox and complex user intents. Our event-driven pipeline generates 2,413 scenarios across four protagonists, grounded in longitudinal life events and annotated by referential, functional, and informational complexity. Evaluation of state-of-the-art models (e.g., Claude-4.5-Opus, DeepSeek-V3.2) reveals significant performance degradation under high-complexity conditions, with argument generation emerging as the primary bottleneck. These findings expose critical limitations in current agents' ability to ground reasoning within messy personal context and orchestrate reliable multi-step plans. We release ASTRA-bench with a full execution environment and evaluation scripts to provide a diagnostic testbed for developing truly context-aware AI assistants.

cs.AI↗