Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2611.07528

Goal-Branching LaCAM: Temporary Goals as Search Branches in Dense Multi-Agent Pathfinding

Abstract

LaCAM is a search-based solver for multi-agent pathfinding (MAPF) that runs a depth-first search over joint configurations, using PIBT to generate successors and lazily adding single-agent constraints to explore alternatives. Although LaCAM is complete, it can struggle on dense, corridor-heavy instances because extracting blocking agents from deadlocks requires coordinated moves of several agents, often away from their goals, which PIBT's greedy one-step successors rarely propose and which LaCAM can only reach by enumerating constraints one agent at a time. This paper proposes Goal-Branching, where blocking agents are given temporary goals, each tried as an additional branch of LaCAM's search. We examine random and corridor-aware rules for choosing these temporary goals and show that completeness is preserved for any such rule. On dense instances (60-90% of free cells occupied) of three maze and room maps, Goal-Branching solves 89% of instances against 44% for LaCAM*, and, on instances both solve, it finds a first solution 10-14x faster on maze-32-32-2 and room-32-32-4, and nearly 200x faster in median time at 75% density on room-32-32-4. Solution cost increases by 15-22% on instances both solve, while on open maps and the full MovingAI benchmark its solutions cost no more than those of LaCAM* and it is at most 3% slower.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Stephen Chang, Daniel Harabor. 2026-11-05. Goal-Branching LaCAM: Temporary Goals as Search Branches in Dense Multi-Agent Pathfinding. https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07528

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Towards Shutdownable Agents via Stochastic Choice

The POST-Agents Proposal (PAP) is an idea for ensuring that advanced artificial agents never resist shutdown. A key part of the PAP is using a novel `Discounted Reward for Same-Length Trajectories (DReST)' reward function to train agents to (1) pursue goals effectively conditional on each trajectory-length (be `USEFUL'), and (2) choose stochastically between different trajectory-lengths (be `NEUTRAL' about trajectory-lengths). In this paper, we propose evaluation metrics for USEFULNESS and NEUTRALITY. We use a DReST reward function to train simple agents to navigate gridworlds, and we find that these agents learn to be USEFUL and NEUTRAL. Our results thus provide some initial evidence that DReST reward functions could train advanced agents to be USEFUL and NEUTRAL. Our theoretical work suggests that these agents would be useful and shutdownable.

cs.AI↗

Depth-Recurrent Attention Mixture (Dreamer): Giving Latent Reasoning the Attention it Deserves

Depth-recurrence facilitates latent reasoning by sharing parameters across depths. However, prior work lacks combined FLOP-, parameter-, and memory-matched baselines, underutilizes depth-recurrence due to partially fixed layer stacks, and ignores the bottleneck of constant hidden-sizes that restricts many-step latent reasoning. To address this, we introduce a modular framework of depth-recurrent attention mixtures (Dreamer), combining sequence attention, depth attention, and sparse expert attention. It alleviates the hidden-size bottleneck through attention along depth, decouples scaling dimensions, and allows depth-recurrent models to scale efficiently and effectively. Across language reasoning benchmarks, our models require 2 to 8x fewer training tokens for the same accuracy as FLOP-, parameter-, and memory-matched SOTA, and outperform ca. 2x larger SOTA models with the same training tokens. We further present insights into knowledge usage across depths, e.g., showing 2 to 11x larger expert selection diversity than SOTA MoEs.

cs.AI↗

ASTRA-bench: Evaluating Tool-Use Agent Reasoning and Action Planning with Personal User Context

Next-generation AI must manage vast personal data, diverse tools, and multi-step reasoning, yet most benchmarks remain context-free and single-turn. We present ASTRA-bench (Assistant Skills in Tool-use, Reasoning \& Action-planning), a benchmark that uniquely unifies time-evolving personal context with an interactive toolbox and complex user intents. Our event-driven pipeline generates 2,413 scenarios across four protagonists, grounded in longitudinal life events and annotated by referential, functional, and informational complexity. Evaluation of state-of-the-art models (e.g., Claude-4.5-Opus, DeepSeek-V3.2) reveals significant performance degradation under high-complexity conditions, with argument generation emerging as the primary bottleneck. These findings expose critical limitations in current agents' ability to ground reasoning within messy personal context and orchestrate reliable multi-step plans. We release ASTRA-bench with a full execution environment and evaluation scripts to provide a diagnostic testbed for developing truly context-aware AI assistants.

cs.AI↗