On the Galois Theory of Grothendieck

E. J. Dubuc; C. Sanchez de la Vega

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · math/0009145

On the Galois Theory of Grothendieck

E. J. Dubuc·C. Sanchez de la Vega

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In this paper we deal with Grothendieck's interpretation of Artin's interpretation of Galois's Galois Theory (and its natural relation with the fundamental group and the theory of coverings) as he developed it in Expose V, section 4, ``Conditions axiomatiques d'une theorie de Galois'' in the SGA1 1960/61. This is a beautiful piece of mathematics very rich in categorical concepts, and goes much beyond the original Galois's scope (just as Galois went much further than the non resubility of the quintic equation). We show explicitly how Grothendieck's abstraction corresponds to Galois work. We introduce some axioms and prove a theorem of characterization of the category (topos) of actions of a discrete group. This theorem corresponds exactly to Galois fundamental result. The theorem of Grothendieck characterizes the category (topos) of continuous actions of a profinite topological group. We develop a proof of this result as a "passage into the limit'' (in an inverse limit of topoi) of our theorem of characterization of the topos of actions of a discrete group. We deal with the inverse limit of topoi just working with an ordinary filtered colimit (or union) of the small categories which are their (respective) sites of definition. We do not consider generalizations of Grothendieck's work, except by commenting briefly in the last section how to deal with the prodiscrete (not profinite) case. We also mention the work of Joyal-Tierney, which falls naturally in our discussion. There is no need of advanced knowledge of category theory to read this paper, exept for the comments in the last section.

Explore related subjects

math.CT

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

E. J. Dubuc, C. Sanchez de la Vega. 2000-09-14. On the Galois Theory of Grothendieck. https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0009145

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

A Categorical Generalization of Counterpoint

We extend Mazzola's counterpoint model using category theory, generalizing from the category $\mathbf{Set}$ to an arbitrary topos other than $\mathbf{Set}$. This generalization suggests that counterpoint's essential structure depends on specific categorical conditions rather than classical set-theoretic reasoning. A key contribution is identifying sufficient requirements for a well-behaved counterpoint theory in a topos: some version of Zorn's Lemma (GJZL), and two-valuedness and split supports (NS). Within a topos, we introduce (weak) quasidichotomies alongside the classical notion of dichotomy. These structures capture varying degrees of oppositional structure between consonance and dissonance, with weak quasidichotomies preserving the non-Boolean flexibility essential to musical practice while quasidichotomies represent maximal opposition short of complete partition. We prove a generalized counterpoint theorem giving sufficient conditions for the existence of admitted successors. When the ambient topos turns non-zero successor objects into points, admitted succession can be iterated to form counterpoint paths, which may terminate at consonances with no admitted successor. The framework naturally accommodates counterpoint with sets instead of pure pitches, relaxing the ``yes/no'' character of classical consonance definitions and emphasizing context-dependence. Mazzola's model allows a Kuratowski closure operator induced by a polarity, which defines an internal topology enabling algebraic-topological analysis of counterpoint structure. We conclude by showing this construction generalizes to involutive morphisms. This categorical approach provides foundations for understanding both the historical evolution of contrapuntal practice and cross-cultural divergences in interval organization.

math.CT↗

arXiv2026

From 3-crossed modules to Gray-type 4-categories

In this paper, we investigate the relation between the category of 3-crossed modules and the category of Gray-type 4-groups. The notion of a 3-crossed module was first introduced by Arvasi \textit{et al.}, motivated by the question of what kind of algebraic structure completely encodes a homotopy 4-type. On the other hand, from the point of view that higher groups are equivalent to algebraic realizations of higher categories -- as exemplified by the relationship between 2-crossed modules and Gray 3-groups established by Sarikaya--Ulualan -- it had not been clear how the 3-crossed modules of Arvasi \textit{et al.} relate to any higher category. In our previous paper, we proposed a new definition of a 3-crossed module and observed that it admits a natural interpretation in terms of higher categories. In this paper, we make this interpretation precise: we introduce a 4-category, which reduces to a semistrict braided monoidal 2-category when restricted to a single object and a single 1-morphism, and prove that the category of our 3-crossed modules is equivalent to the category of Gray 4-groups, defined as single-object versions of this 4-category in which all morphisms are invertible. We therefore expect that these structures can correctly capture the topological nature of surface knots and higher-dimensional manifolds.

math.CT↗

arXiv2026

Observations on the variety of equationally linear Heyting semilattices

In previous work, we analysed a number of categorical properties, of interest in the context of Janelidze-Márki-Tholen semi-abelian categories, for the variety $\mathsf{HSLat}$ of Heyting semilattices. In this paper, we focus on the subvariety $\mathsf{ELHSLat}$ of equationally linear Heyting semilattices. Our main objective is to show that, unlike $\mathsf{HSLat}$, this category is algebraically coherent. We furthermore prove that it is neither locally algebraically cartesian closed nor cosmash associative.

math.CT↗