Search arXivSearch

arXiv · math/0402275

On completeness in a non-Archimedean setting via firm reflections

Abstract

We develop a completion theory for (general) non-Archimedean spaces based on the theory on "a categorical concept of completion of objects" as introduced by G.C.L. Brümmer and E. Giuli. Our context is the construct $\mathbf{NA}_0$ of all Hausdorff non-Archimedean spaces and uniformly continuous maps and $\mathcal{V}$ is the class of all epimorphic embeddings in $\mathbf{NA}_0$. We determine the class ${\bf Inj} \mathcal{V}$ of all $\mathcal{V}$-injective objects and we present an internal characterization as "complete objects". The basic tool for this characterization is a notion of small collections that in some sense preserve the inclusion order on the non-Archimedean structure. We prove that the full subconstruct $\mathbf{CNA}_0$ consisting of all complete objects forms a firmly $\mathcal{V}$-reflective subcategory. This means that every object $X$ in $\mathbf{NA}_0$ has a completion which is a $\mathcal{V}$-reflection $r_X:X\to RX$ into the full subconstruct $\mathbf{CNA}_0$ of "complete spaces". Moreover this completion is unique (up to isomorphism) in the sense that, considering $L(\mathbf{CNA}_0)$, the class of all those morphisms $u: X\to Y$ for which $Ru:RX\to RY$ is an isomorphism, one has that $\mathcal{V}$ is contained in $L(\mathbf{CNA}_0)$. In fact one even has $\mathcal{V}=L(\mathbf{CNA}_0)$. Finally we apply our constructions to the classical case of Hausdorff non-Archimedean uniform spaces, in that case our completion reduces to the standard one.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

D. Deses, E. Lowen-Colebunders. 2004-02-17. On completeness in a non-Archimedean setting via firm reflections. https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0402275

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Maximal Center of Distances of Finite Ultrametric Spaces and Perfect Binary Trees

We investigate the finite ultrametric spaces $(X,d)$ that have a given cardinality of the center of distances and a minimal cardinality of the set $X$. It is shown that such spaces are isometric if and only if their centers of distances are the same. The representing trees of these spaces are characterized up to isomorphism.

math.GN

A continuous $3$-distributive frame that is not $\omega$-distributive

We give a negative answer to the question, posed by Ern\'e, whether every $3$-distributive lattice is $\omega$-distributive. More precisely, we exhibit a continuous frame that is $\kappa$-distributive for every integer $\kappa\geq 2$, but is not a wide coframe. The frame is the open-set lattice of a compact, locally compact, countably based $T_0$ topological meet-semilattice, obtained from Lawson's construction in the logarithmic form described by Goubault-Larrecq. The failure of $\omega$-distributivity is witnessed by an explicit matrix with countably many nonempty finite rows: all row joins are the same nonzero element, whereas every choice of one entry from each row has meet zero. The same space answers negatively Ern\'e's accompanying question whether every $4$-web space is a wide web space. All properties of the construction needed for these conclusions are proved directly.

math.GN

An overlooked weakening of perfect normality: Perfect regularity in spaces and locales

We introduce the notion of perfect regularity as an appropriate weakening of perfect normality, both for spaces and locales. Various characterizations are given, using Dedekind-MacNeille completions, injective hulls, and sublocales. We place the new class of perfectly regular frames among various well-studied classes of frames. We also introduce the construction of perfect regularization of a completely regular frame, compare it to Isbell's well-known booleanization construction, and argue that it is at least as important as the latter.

math.GN