Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · physics/0611119

The discovery of superfluidity

Sebastien Balibar
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Superfluidity is a remarkable manifestation of quantum mechanics at the macroscopic level. This article describes the history of its discovery, which took place at a particularly difficult period of the twentieth century. A special emphasis is given to the role of J.F. Allen, D. Misener, P. Kapitza, F. London, L. Tisza and L.D. Landau. The nature and the importance of their respective contributions are analyzed and compared. Of particular interest is the controversy between Landau on one side, London and Tisza on the other, concerning the relevance of Bose-Einstein condensation to the whole issue, and also on the nature of thermal excitations in superfluid helium 4. In order to aid my understanding of this period, I have collected several testimonies which inform us about the work and attitude of these great scientists.

Explore related subjects

physics.hist-ph

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Sebastien Balibar. 2006-11-13. The discovery of superfluidity. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10909-006-9276-7

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Turning Old Anomalies Into New Evidence: Evidential Reconfiguration and Dark Matter in 1974

The 1974 papers by Ostriker et al. (1974) and Einasto et al. (1974) are regarded as pivotal in establishing the evidential case for dark matter, although both relied on already existing observational data. By what means did they transform known observational anomalies into evidential support for dark matter? I argue that this transformation arose through evidential reconfiguration: extended galactic halos supplied a physical connection between galaxy rotation curves and cluster mass discrepancies, expanding the context of assessment so that results previously investigated locally could constrain one another. The significance of this connection was assessed against differing cosmological commitments and unresolved local dynamical assumptions, which help explain both the emphases of the two papers and their reception. To explicate its contribution to confirmation, I draw on Myrvold's Bayesian account of unification and use a toy model in which taking one result into account changes the assessment of a shared halo parameter, thereby altering expectations about the other. Comparison with an uncoupled model makes the resulting support explicit, while variations of the model show why a shared parameter alone is insufficient: the contribution depends on the connecting assumptions and what competing models predict. The novelty relevant to the old-evidence problem thus lies in what familiar observations became jointly capable of supporting. This reconstruction assesses that support once the connection is specified, while leaving a full account of historical belief change open.

physics.hist-ph↗
arXiv2026

On Algebraic Background-Independence

It has recently been claimed that algebraic methods can be used to give a background-independent description of semiclassical gravity. This paper aims to provide an entry point into recent algebraic approaches to quantum gravity and to analyse and critically assess the conception of background-independence here involved. We discuss an algebraic framework for formulating an algebra of observables along the worldline of an observer in a cosmological setting. By 'gravitationally dressing' the observables to the observer's worldline, the reference to the spacetime background can be set aside at the level of the abstract *-algebra. Thus this *-algebra is taken to be independent of any particular spacetime realisation, with different states on the algebra corresponding to different backgrounds. We compare this algebraic framework to three influential notions of background-independence in the literature and argue that none of these fully captures the sense in which the *-algebra is taken to be background-independent. Building on this, we extract a novel notion of algebraic background-independence tied to the representation-independence of the *-algebra. This algebraic conception motivates two further concepts of background-independence tailored to semiclassical theories: semiclassical background-independence and perturbative background-independence. We suggest that these provide useful tools for evaluating the scope and limitations of semiclassical approaches to quantum gravity.

physics.hist-ph↗
arXiv2026

Between Heisenberg and Feynman: Ettore Majorana's Reflections on the Meaning of Quantum Theory

Ettore Majorana is undoubtedly one of the most important figures in 20th-century Italian science. His contributions to nuclear physics and Quantum Mechanics (QM) included innovative ideas, and the search for Majorana-type neutrinos remains an ongoing experimental research question. However, very little is known about his perspective on the significance of the quantum state, the philosophical implications of the then-new mechanics, and the relationship between QM and other sciences. This chapter aims to address this gap. In more detail, here I present the standard interpretation of Majorana's view on the quantum state, according to which the Italian physicist anticipated the physical content of Feynman's path-integral formulation of quantum theory. In what follows, I critically examine this position and propose an alternative understanding of Majorana's beliefs on the nature of the quantum state and the wave function. Finally, I briefly discuss his reflections concerning the major conceptual revolutions introduced by QM, notably, in his view, the impossibility of extending the objectivity and determinism of classical mechanics to the quantum realm, and their consequences for the relation between physics and the social sciences, disciplines that Majorana deeply studied before his disappearance.

physics.hist-ph↗