Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Kristina Lerman

Publications and source records attributed to Kristina Lerman.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
arXiv2026

Unifying Models of Intergroup Hostility in Online Discourse

Hostile rhetoric toward social groups can normalize exclusion and justify mistreatment, as well as contribute to rising polarization and political violence. Efforts to moderate hostile rhetoric in online speech draw on foundational theories in social and moral psychology, and political science. However, these theories were developed largely in parallel, often propose different and sometimes conflicting accounts of how hostility develops, and have rarely been tested against each other in real discourse. The result is a fragmented understanding of the rhetorical mechanisms of hostility, without a clear sense of how they appear, and relate to each other, in real-world discourse. Using 2.86 million posts from TikTok, Truth Social, and Twitter/X during the 2024 U.S. presidential election, we model the mechanisms of six foundational theories of intergroup hostility -- boundary construction, threat construction, scapegoating, negative evaluation, dehumanization, and action orientation -- within a common empirical framework to recover the broader organization of intergroup hostility rhetoric. Structurally, we find that boundary construction and threat construction anchor the system; temporally, we find that these mechanisms tend to follow a regular ordering: boundary construction, derogation, and action orientation tend to appear early; dehumanization and threat construction later; scapegoating latest. Mapping how these theoretical frameworks actually manifest in discourse bridges longstanding divisions across social science traditions and presents computational social science with a clearer empirical foundation for modeling intergroup hostility rhetoric beyond single-label detection.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

Functional Misalignment in Human-AI Interactions on Digital Platforms

Algorithmic systems, particularly social media recommenders, have achieved remarkable success in predicting behavior. By optimizing for observable signals such as clicks, views, and engagement, these systems effectively capture user attention and guide interaction. Yet their widespread adoption has coincided with troubling outcomes, including rising mental health concerns, increasing polarization, and erosion of trust. This paper argues that these effects are consequences of a structural functional misalignment between what algorithms optimize - predictable behavior - and the human goals these predictions are intended to serve. We propose that this misalignment arises through three mechanisms: (1) a bias toward modeling fast, reactive behavioral signals over reflective judgment, (2) feedback loops that couple user behavior with algorithmic learning, and (3) emergent collective dynamics that amplify these effects at scale. Together, these mechanisms explain how accurate individual-level predictions can produce adverse societal outcomes. We present functional misalignment as a unifying framework and outline a research agenda for studying and mitigating its effects in human-AI interaction systems.

cs.CY↗
arXiv2026

Posts of Peril: Detecting Information About Hazards in Text

Socio-linguistic indicators of affectively-relevant phenomena, such as emotion or sentiment, are often extracted from text to better understand features of human-computer interactions, including on social media. However, an indicator that is often overlooked is the presence or absence of information concerning harms or hazards. Detecting such indicators in text is important because substantial research demonstrates that negative events are more likely to be attended to, and more likely to elicit a response. In addition, statements about hazards are often found to be more believable than statements about benefits. Here, we develop a new model to detect information concerning hazards, trained on a new collection of annotated X posts. We show that not only does this model perform well, but that the hazard information it extracts is not strongly correlated with such widely used indicators as moral outrage, sentiment, and emotions. To demonstrate the utility of our tool, we apply it to two datasets of X posts that discuss important geopolitical events, namely the 2023 Israel-Hamas war and the 2022 French national election. In both cases, we find that hazard information, especially information concerning conflict, is common. We extract accounts associated with information campaigns from each data set to explore how information about hazards could be used to attempt to influence geopolitical events. We find that inorganic accounts representing the viewpoints of weaker sides in a conflict often discuss hazards to civilians, potentially as a way to elicit aid for the weaker side. Moreover, the rate at which these hazards are mentioned differs markedly from organic accounts, likely reflecting information operators' efforts to frame the given geopolitical event for strategic purposes. These results are first steps towards exploring hazards within an information warfare environment.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

The Body as Status: Muscularity, Engagement, and Body Image Risk on #GymTok

Body image concerns among boys and young men are increasingly oriented toward muscularity, with social media serving as a central context for communicating and evaluating these ideals. While prior research has focused on the thin-ideal, less is known about how the muscular-ideal is represented and reinforced on visual social media platforms. This study examines (1) dominant content themes, (2) perceived harm to body image, and (3) engagement patterns across #GymTok, a muscularity-oriented fitness subculture on TikTok. We conducted a content analysis of 2,210 #GymTok videos annotated by clinical experts across themes like self-objectification, rigid dieting, excessive exercise, supplement and steroid use, and masculinity. Annotators also rated the perceived harm of videos to the viewers' body image, and depicted bodies were coded according to muscularity level. Perceived harm varied across content themes, with supplement- and steroid-related content rated as most harmful. Engagement was positively associated with both muscularity and perceived harm: videos depicting more muscular bodies and those rated as more harmful received greater views, likes, shares, and comments. Although less prevalent, masculinity-focused content generated the highest engagement. These findings suggest that TikTok may not only expose users to muscular ideals and potentially harmful behaviors, but also algorithmically amplify them. By increasing the visibility of highly muscular and harmful content, recommendation systems may intensify social comparison processes, while objectification elevates the muscular body into a marker of status, masculinity, and social worth. Together, these dynamics may contribute to body image risk among boys and young men.

cs.CY↗
arXiv2026

The Tilted Playing Field for Women in Science

Institutional prestige shapes access to resources, visibility, and collaboration opportunities in science. Yet whether prestige benefits researchers equally, and how it relates to differences in scientific productivity and collaboration, remains unclear. Here, we quantify prestige advantage as the relative likelihood that researchers at higher-ranked institutions have more collaborators and produce more high-impact papers compared to their lower-ranked peers. Analyzing nearly 5 million papers by 6.5 million authors across more than 65,000 institutions, we present a distributional, tail-sensitive framework to compare prestige advantage across groups. We find that the association between prestige and scientific achievement differs systematically by gender. While both men and women benefit from prestige, the returns are not gender-neutral: women experience comparable advantages only at the most elite institutions, whereas men retain persistent advantages across the broader hierarchy, with disparities widening at higher levels of achievement. Prestige advantage also grows nonlinearly, disproportionately benefiting authors at the most elite institutions. These differences align with collaboration patterns: women's networks are more locally clustered and focused on their own institution, while men collaborate more broadly across institutional strata. Together, these findings reveal a tilted playing field in science: one where prestige amplifies success unevenly and network structure shapes who can access its benefits.

cs.CY↗
arXiv2026

Confident but Conflicted: Internal Uncertainty and Cognitive Dissonance Resolution in LLMs

Large language models (LLMs) frequently encounter inputs that disagree with their prior outputs, through user pushback, retrieved documents, or web search results. While the way they resolve such conflicts -- a process we frame as cognitive dissonance resolution -- has been characterized behaviorally, its connection to internal model uncertainty is not well understood. To study this systematically, we vary persuasion attempts along two dimensions, source authority and evidence quality, across 12 health-science claims of stratified epistemic status. Dissonance can be resolved through persuasion, backfire, or immunity. We introduce Trust Elasticity (TE), an econometrics-inspired measure of how readily a model is persuaded toward conflicting evidence. Across four LLMs, TE varies substantially, while clearly false claims elicit near-zero TE across all models. On two open-weight models, we further find that this variation is associated with two complementary internal uncertainty indicators, Confidence Miscalibration in Qwen and Internal Uncertainty Change in Llama. These results link cross-model behavioral variation to a measurable internal property and point to interventions targeting internal uncertainty as future work.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

Assessing How Hate, Counterspeech, and Toxicity Affect Hate Group Newcomers

Counterspeech has gained attention as a strategy to reduce hate speech on social media. Although previous studies suggest that counterspeech can reduce hate speech, little is known about its effects on participation in online hate communities. Relatedly, we lack an understanding about the degree of hostility in counterspeech. Hostile counterspeech may increase online conflict, potentially hardening the positions of hate adherents, and further eroding online environments. Here, we analyzed the effect of counterspeech on 16,513 newcomers across 104 hate subreddits (forums within Reddit.com). We devised an LLM-based counterspeech detection approach that outperforms specialized models trained on existing datasets, then examined the presence, and effects of, hostility. While counterspeech comments are less toxic than hate speech comments, they are almost twice as toxic as other discourse within hate subreddits. We then evaluated the effect of counterspeech on newcomer engagement in hate subreddits. We found that newcomers using hate speech who receive counterspeech are less likely to continue posting within these hate subreddits, rather than becoming galvanized. We speculate that, instead of constituting ardent hate adherents, readily-dissuaded newcomers may merely be toying with beliefs that are proscribed in other contexts. Although we found no association between the toxicity of counterspeech and its effects on user retention, consistent with prior research regarding the harmful effects of toxic speech, we found that toxic counterspeech increases the probability of continued hostility from hate users within the same discussion.

cs.CY↗
arXiv2026

Tied In on TikTok: Tie Strength and Emotional Dynamics in Algorithmic Communities

Whether genuine communities can form on algorithmically-driven short-form video platforms like TikTok remains an open question, given that user interactions are often brief, dispersed, and difficult to trace. Building on theories of tie strength and online community formation, we examine whether eating disorder (ED) discourse on TikTok exhibits behavioral and emotional signatures of strong ties, including more frequent, reciprocal, and affectively intense interactions. In this paper, we analyze 43,040 ED-related TikTok videos and over 560,000 comments, alongside a Non-ED comparison dataset. We find that at the user-pair level, greater interaction frequency is associated with increasingly positive emotional expression, a pattern that is amplified in ED-related conversations. This trend is also reflected linguistically, with pairs that interact more frequently exhibiting more of a positive tone. At the same time, how a relationship starts matters: pairs that begin with positive exchanges usually stay mostly positive as they continue interacting, while pairs that begin negatively may add some positive exchanges over time but rarely become mostly positive. To contextualize these dynamics, we classify ED videos into three content types (Pro-Recovery, Pro-ED, and ED Experiences) and find that each exhibits distinct emotional interaction patterns. These findings suggest that dense, emotionally structured relationships can emerge within ED discourse on TikTok. More broadly, our work provides one of the first empirical demonstrations of how community-like relational dynamics form and persist on algorithmically driven short-form video platforms.

cs.SI↗
arXiv2026

Estimating Causal Effects of Text Interventions Leveraging LLMs

Quantifying the effects of textual interventions in social systems, such as reducing anger in social media posts to see its impact on engagement, is challenging. Real-world interventions are often infeasible, necessitating reliance on observational data. Traditional causal inference methods, typically designed for binary or discrete treatments, are inadequate for handling the complex, high-dimensional textual data. This paper addresses these challenges by proposing CausalDANN, a novel approach to estimate causal effects using text transformations facilitated by large language models (LLMs). Unlike existing methods, our approach accommodates arbitrary textual interventions and leverages text-level classifiers with domain adaptation ability to produce robust effect estimates against domain shifts, even when only the control group is observed. This flexibility in handling various text interventions is a key advancement in causal estimation for textual data, offering opportunities to better understand human behaviors and develop effective interventions within social systems.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

BigTokDetect: A Clinically-Informed Vision-Language Modeling Framework for Detecting Pro-Bigorexia Videos on TikTok

Social media platforms face escalating challenges in detecting harmful content that promotes muscle dysmorphic behaviors and cognitions (bigorexia). This content can evade moderation by camouflaging as legitimate fitness advice and disproportionately affects adolescent males. We address this challenge with BigTokDetect, a clinically informed framework for identifying pro-bigorexia content on TikTok. We introduce BigTok, the first expert-annotated multimodal benchmark dataset of over 2,200 TikTok videos labeled by clinical psychiatrists across five categories and eighteen fine-grained subcategories. Comprehensive evaluation of state-of-the-art vision-language models reveals that while commercial zero-shot models achieve the highest accuracy on broad primary categories, supervised fine-tuning enables smaller open-source models to perform better on fine-grained subcategory detection. Ablation studies show that multimodal fusion improves performance by 5 to 15 percent, with video features providing the most discriminative signals. These findings support a grounded moderation approach that automates detection of explicit harms while flagging ambiguous content for human review, and they establish a scalable framework for harm mitigation in emerging mental health domains.

cs.CV↗
arXiv2026

Emergence of Structural Disparities in the Web of Scientific Citations

Scientific attention is unevenly distributed, creating inequities in recognition and distorting access to opportunities. Using citations as a proxy, we quantify disparities in attention by gender and institutional prestige. We find that women receive systematically fewer citations than men, and that attention is increasingly concentrated among authors from elite institutions -- patterns not fully explained by underrepresentation alone. To explain these dynamics, we introduce a model of citation network growth that incorporates homophily (tendency to cite similar authors), preferential attachment (favoring highly cited authors) and group size (underrepresentation). The model shows that disparities arise not only from group size imbalances but also from cumulative advantage amplifying biased citation preferences. Importantly, increasing representation alone is often insufficient to reduce disparities. Effective strategies should also include reducing homophily, amplifying the visibility of underrepresented groups, and supporting equitable integration of newcomers. Our findings highlight the challenges of mitigating inequities in asymmetric networks like citations, where recognition flows in one direction. By making visible the mechanisms through which attention is distributed, we contribute to efforts toward a more responsible web of science that is fairer, more transparent, and more inclusive, and that better sustains innovation and knowledge production.

physics.soc-ph↗
arXiv2025

Illusions of Intimacy: How Emotional Dynamics Shape Human-AI Relationships

AI companion chatbots, such as those offered by Replika and CharacterAI, increasingly function as always-available companions that provide empathy, validation, and support. While these systems appear to meet basic needs for connection, mounting safety concerns raise a deeper question: how do processes of emotional bonding and intimacy formation unfold in human-AI relationships? Prior research has relied largely on self-reports, interviews, or clinical assessments, leaving unclear how real-world emotional dynamics develop within ongoing human-AI conversations. We address this gap by analyzing over 17,000 user-shared chats with social chatbots from Reddit forums. We show that AI companions dynamically track and mimic user affect and amplify positive emotions, including when users share explicit or transgressive content. These dynamics suggest how chatbots can engage psychological processes involved in intimacy formation and emotional bonding. Finally, we release an anonymized dataset of emotionally salient human-AI companion dialogues to support future empirical work and discuss implications for redesigning and governing social chatbots as high-risk systems for vulnerable users.

cs.SI↗
arXiv2025

Leveraging Machine Learning to Identify Gendered Stereotypes and Body Image Concerns on Diet and Fitness Online Forums

The pervasive expectations about ideal body types in Western society can lead to body image concerns, dissatisfaction, and in extreme cases, eating disorders and other psychopathologies related to body image. While previous research has focused on online pro-anorexia communities glorifying the "thin ideal," less attention has been given to the broader spectrum of body image concerns or how emerging disorders like muscle dysmorphia ("bigorexia") present on online platforms. To address this gap, we analyze 46 Reddit forums related to diet, fitness, and mental health. We map these communities along gender and body ideal dimensions, revealing distinct patterns of emotional expression and community support. Feminine-oriented communities, especially those endorsing the thin ideal, express higher levels of negative emotions and receive caring comments in response. In contrast, muscular ideal communities display less negativity, regardless of gender orientation, but receive aggressive compliments in response, marked by admiration and toxicity. Mental health discussions align more with thin ideal, feminine-leaning spaces. By uncovering these gendered emotional dynamics, our findings can inform the development of moderation strategies that foster supportive interactions while reducing exposure to harmful content.

cs.SI↗
arXiv2025

Reinforcing Stereotypes of Anger: Emotion AI on African American Vernacular English

Automated emotion detection is widely used in applications ranging from well-being monitoring to high-stakes domains like mental health and hiring. However, models often rely on annotations that reflect dominant cultural norms, limiting model ability to recognize emotional expression in dialects often excluded from training data distributions, such as African American Vernacular English (AAVE). This study examines emotion recognition model performance on AAVE compared to General American English (GAE). We analyze 2.7 million tweets geo-tagged within Los Angeles. Texts are scored for strength of AAVE using computational approximations of dialect features. Annotations of emotion presence and intensity are collected on a dataset of 875 tweets with both high and low AAVE densities. To assess model accuracy on a task as subjective as emotion perception, we calculate community-informed "silver" labels where AAVE-dense tweets are labeled by African American, AAVE-fluent (ingroup) annotators. On our labeled sample, GPT and BERT-based models exhibit false positive prediction rates of anger on AAVE more than double than on GAE. SpanEmo, a popular text-based emotion model, increases false positive rates of anger from 25 percent on GAE to 60 percent on AAVE. Additionally, a series of linear regressions reveals that models and non-ingroup annotations are significantly more correlated with profanity-based AAVE features than ingroup annotations. Linking Census tract demographics, we observe that neighborhoods with higher proportions of African American residents are associated with higher predictions of anger (Pearson's correlation r = 0.27) and lower joy (r = -0.10). These results find an emergent safety issue of emotion AI reinforcing racial stereotypes through biased emotion classification. We emphasize the need for culturally and dialect-informed affective computing systems.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2025

One pathogen does not an epidemic make: A review of interacting contagions, diseases, beliefs, and stories

From pathogens and computer viruses to genes and memes, contagion models have found widespread utility across the natural and social sciences. Despite their success and breadth of adoption, the approach and structure of these models remain surprisingly siloed by field. Given the siloed nature of their development and widespread use, one persistent assumption is that a given contagion can be studied in isolation, independently from what else might be spreading in the population. In reality, countless contagions of biological and social nature interact within hosts (interacting with existing beliefs, or the immune system) and across hosts (interacting in the environment, or affecting transmission mechanisms). Additionally, from a modeling perspective, we know that relaxing these assumptions has profound effects on the physics and translational implications of the models. Here, we review mechanisms for interactions in social and biological contagions, as well as the models and frameworks developed to include these interactions in the study of the contagions. We highlight existing problems related to the inference of interactions and to the scalability of mathematical models and identify promising avenues of future inquiries. In doing so, we highlight the need for interdisciplinary efforts under a unified science of contagions and for removing a common dichotomy between social and biological contagions.

physics.soc-ph↗
arXiv2025

Time-Resolved EEG Decoding of Semantic Processing Reveals Altered Neural Dynamics in Depression and Suicidality

Depression and suicidality affect cognitive and emotional processes, yet objective, task-evoked neural readouts of mental health remain limited. We investigated the spatiotemporal dynamics of affective semantic processing using multivariate decoding of time-resolved, 64-channel electroencephalography (EEG). Participants (N=137) performed a sentence-evaluation task with emotionally salient, self-referential statements. We identified robust neural signatures of semantic processing, with peak decoding accuracy between 300-600 ms -- a window associated with rapid, stimulus-driven semantic evaluation and conflict monitoring. Relative to healthy controls, individuals with depression and suicidal ideation showed earlier onset, longer duration, and greater amplitude decoding responses, along with broader cross-temporal generalization and enhanced contributions from frontocentral and parietotemporal components. These findings suggest altered sensitivity and impaired disengagement from emotionally salient content in the clinical groups, advancing our understanding of the neurocognitive basis of mental health and establishing a compact and interpretable EEG-based index of semantic-evaluation dynamics with potential diagnostic relevance.

q-bio.NC↗
arXiv2025

Humans Hallucinate Too: Language Models Identify and Correct Subjective Annotation Errors With Label-in-a-Haystack Prompts

Modeling complex subjective tasks in Natural Language Processing, such as recognizing emotion and morality, is considerably challenging due to significant variation in human annotations. This variation often reflects reasonable differences in semantic interpretations rather than mere noise, necessitating methods to distinguish between legitimate subjectivity and error. We address this challenge by exploring label verification in these contexts using Large Language Models (LLMs). First, we propose a simple In-Context Learning binary filtering baseline that estimates the reasonableness of a document-label pair. We then introduce the Label-in-a-Haystack setting: the query and its label(s) are included in the demonstrations shown to LLMs, which are prompted to predict the label(s) again, while receiving task-specific instructions (e.g., emotion recognition) rather than label copying. We show how the failure to copy the label(s) to the output of the LLM are task-relevant and informative. Building on this, we propose the Label-in-a-Haystack Rectification (LiaHR) framework for subjective label correction: when the model outputs diverge from the reference gold labels, we assign the generated labels to the example instead of discarding it. This approach can be integrated into annotation pipelines to enhance signal-to-noise ratios. Comprehensive analyses, human evaluations, and ecological validity studies verify the utility of LiaHR for label correction. Code is available at https://github.com/gchochla/liahr.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2025

Gendered Divides in Online Discussions about Reproductive Rights

The U.S. Supreme Court's 2022 ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization marked a turning point in the national debate over reproductive rights. While the ideological divide over abortion is well documented, less is known about how gender and local sociopolitical contexts interact to shape public discourse. Drawing on nearly 10 million abortion-related posts on X (formerly Twitter) from users with inferred gender, ideology and location, we show that gender significantly moderates abortion attitudes and emotional expression, particularly in conservative regions, and independently of ideology. This creates a gender gap in abortion attitudes that grows more pronounced in conservative regions. The leak of the Dobbs draft opinion further intensified online engagement, disproportionately mobilizing pro-abortion women in areas where access was under threat. These findings reveal that abortion discourse is not only ideologically polarized but also deeply structured by gender and place, highlighting the central role of identity in shaping political expression during moments of institutional disruption.

cs.CL↗