Search arXivSearch

arXiv subjects

Minhui Xue

Publications and source records attributed to Minhui Xue.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Take Only What You Need: Rank Minimization as an Implicit Forgetting Regularizer in Continual Learning

The central tension in continual learning (CL) is the trade-off between plasticity (acquiring new knowledge) and stability (retaining prior knowledge). We study how a pre-trained backbone can be continually updated to absorb new knowledge while preserving existing capabilities, via capacity control: regulating the effective rank of each parameter update, a per-step quantity directly controllable inside a LoRA update. A controlled probe of LoRA rank and placement across modules and tasks reveals a consistent trade-off, with a moderate-rank sweet spot that varies by placement and task, leaving no universally optimal fixed rank; a formal bound shows forgetting grows with rank. Building on these findings, we propose Continual Dynamic Rank-Selective LoRA (CoDyRA), which jointly trains each LoRA update with rank minimization via sparsity-promoting regularization on per-component importance weights. The supervised objective drives plasticity; rank minimization regularizes forgetting. We show that rank minimization serves as an implicit forgetting regularizer in the CL regime, protecting general capability and prior-task knowledge simultaneously by controlling forgetting against the current model state. Across MTIL, X-TAIL, and TRACE (CLIP, LLaMA, Gemma), CoDyRA outperforms prior CL methods on new knowledge learning and forgetting, achieving a strong plasticity-stability balance. Project page: https://artificer-ai-lab.github.io/CoDyRA.

cs.CV

AI Alignment through a Game-theoretic Lens: A Survey

As large language models and increasingly capable AI agents are deployed in high-risk settings, aligning them with complex human values has become a central challenge. Existing alignment methods, while effective in improving helpfulness, harmlessness, and controllability, often struggle to capture real-world preferences that are context-dependent, non-transitive, and shaped by dynamic multi-party interactions. This survey reviews AI alignment through a game-theoretic lens. Specifically, it organizes recent progress around key game-theoretic elements and synthesizes the literature along three challenges: preference diversity, alignment priority, and temporal dynamics. This perspective clarifies where current alignment methods genuinely benefit from game-theoretic analysis, where the framework is looser, and what challenges remain in building robust, adaptive, and verifiable AI systems.

cs.AI