arXiv subjects

Qiaozhu Mei

Publications and source records attributed to Qiaozhu Mei.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

A misinformation playbook sharpens judgement without breeding cynicism

Misinformation harms public health and democracy, and generative artificial intelligence now writes falsehoods as persuasive as people's. Defences range from fact-checking individual claims to training people to resist falsehoods. Yet many claims are too new to check, and interventions that teach doubt can reduce belief in truth too. We propose a defence that targets not the facts of each claim but the persuasion strategies that recur across them. Here we show that learning misinformation's persuasion playbook, mapped from 214,646 fact-checked claims in 51 languages, can sharpen human and machine judgement of claims they know little about, without making either more cynical about true claims. The playbook spans social influence, information manipulation and emotional appeals, combined around a core of fear, conspiracy and fabrication. Briefed with it, plus a reminder that persuasion is not proof of falsehood, a language model better distinguished true from machine-generated false claims about events after its training data. In a pre-registered experiment, the same briefing improved people's discernment of claims they reported as unfamiliar and left their belief in true claims unchanged. Averaged over all claims, the gain was not statistically significant. Because it targets what recurs, this defence need not wait for claim-specific fact-checks.

cs.CY↗

arXiv2026

BehaviorBench: Benchmarking Foundation Models for Behavioral Science Tasks

Foundation models have been increasingly applied to behavioral science domains such as psychology, sociology, and economics. While these models show promise in tasks such as survey response prediction and human-subject experiment simulation, there remains no systematic understanding of how well they perform across diverse behavioral science tasks. We introduce BehaviorBench, a comprehensive benchmark that evaluates foundation models along four core capabilities: (1) behavior prediction and simulation, (2) strategic decision-making, (3) subject-trait inference, and (4) behavioral knowledge application. Crucially, BehaviorBench evaluates model outputs at both the individual and distributional levels, capturing not only per-subject accuracy but also population-level alignment, an essential requirement for behavioral validity. Our evaluation shows that BehaviorBench remains challenging for leading general-purpose LLMs and behavior foundation models that are specifically trained with behavioral data. We find that individual-level and distributional performance do not always align. General-purpose LLMs tend to underestimate the diversity of human responses, whereas behavior foundation models often lag behind at individual-level prediction. Our investigation further demonstrates how fine-tuning on diverse behavioral data can improve both individual-level prediction and distributional alignment, balancing these two objectives. Our results highlight the importance of evaluation at both individual and distributional levels, establishing BehaviorBench as a foundation for developing and assessing behaviorally aligned AI systems. Our BehaviorBench and models can be accessed via https://umich-foreseer.github.io/behaviorbench/

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

HouseholdBench: Evaluating Large Language Models as Predictors of Household Economic Behavior

Large language models (LLMs) have the potential to meet a key goal in economics: a quantitative model of household decision making, across a variety of settings. Yet existing evaluations cover few surveys and outcomes, and do not study how households adjust to changing economic conditions. We introduce a new evaluation, HouseholdBench, which unites 6 U.S. household surveys and 32 prediction tasks spanning numeric, categorical and probabilistic outcomes, related to consumption, income, labor, expectations, and housing. Using past behavior, demographics and macroeconomic conditions, the tasks test whether LLMs predict behavior, including how households adjust to changes in various policies. We evaluate 13 proprietary and open-weight LLMs against a no-change baseline and a gradient-boosted tree model. Most LLMs outperform the no-change baseline, including for policy response tasks -- with the best model lowering error for numeric outcomes by 12.2%. Across most tasks, gradient-boosted trees rank first; leading proprietary LLMs approach their performance, but open-weight models lag. LLMs exhibit systematic over- and underprediction across different tasks. We identify methods that enable a 4 billion parameter open-weight model to match proprietary models' performance: fine-tuning and aggregating 16 predictions per observation. Improvements generalize to policy-response tasks, which are excluded from fine-tuning. We release our datasets, code, and leaderboard on our website: https://jn-huang.github.io/householdbench

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

FlyAOC: Evaluating Agentic Ontology Curation of Drosophila Scientific Knowledge Bases

Scientific knowledge bases accelerate discovery by curating findings from primary literature into structured, queryable formats for both human researchers and emerging AI systems. Maintaining these resources requires expert curators to search papers, reconcile evidence across documents, and produce ontology-grounded annotations. Existing benchmarks usually evaluate isolated subtasks, such as named entity recognition or relation extraction, and therefore do not capture this end-to-end workflow. We present FlyAOC to evaluate AI agents on end-to-end agentic ontology curation from scientific literature. Given a gene symbol, a concise FlyBase gene description, access to a 16,898-paper corpus, and ontology resources, agents must search for evidence and recover as many curator-relevant structured annotations as possible. Outputs span standardized function terms, expression patterns, and historical synonyms linking decades of nomenclature. The benchmark includes 7,397 expert-curated annotations across 100 genes drawn from FlyBase, the Drosophila knowledge base. Across four baseline agent harnesses---memorization, fixed pipeline, single-agent, and multi-agent---FlyAOC is sensitive to harness design, model family, and tool-use reliability. These results reveal system-level failure modes that model-only evaluations do not capture. FlyAOC provides a reproducible testbed for retrieval-augmented scientific curation.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

Modeling Human Behavior with Type Vectors Using AI

We introduce a general, easy-to-implement AI-based modeling technique for analyzing human behavior. A key feature of this approach, which contrasts with existing modeling techniques, is that it combines the flexibility and interpretability of natural language with a mathematical structure that can be fitted to data and easily analyzed. We assign a large language model a vector of trait intensities-a type vector-and then ask it to choose actions across settings in which we observe human choices. For instance, the type vector (2,4) could correspond to "You are a player characterized by the following profile: Altruism: 2 out of 5, Risk Aversion: 4 out of 5," after which it is asked to make choices. We can then vary the traits (e.g., Altruism, Fairness, Trust,...) and values (e.g., 1-5) to minimize distance to human choices. We illustrate the method by applying it to model 119,147 decisions made by 78,657 subjects from more than 35 countries across 10 classic economic game roles. We find that human behavior can be closely matched using three dimensions: Risk Aversion, Strategic Sophistication, and Trust. The type vectors needed to fit individuals across games cluster into fewer than a dozen groups, with substantial variation in fit across subjects. Moreover, the individual type vectors can predict behavior in held-out games with different rules and available actions. More broadly, this new modeling method is highly generalizable and interpretable: we can input any vector of traits and use them to model behavior across any setting

econ.TH↗

arXiv2026

ECP-Bench: Benchmarking and Learning Entertainment Content Promotion with Foundation Models

Content promotion spans a broad set of skills, from understanding content to forecasting its market reception. However, LLMs' ability to support such promotion decisions remains underexplored. Existing studies are often limited to a single task (e.g., popularity prediction) or a small set of tasks within a single domain (e.g., movies). As a result, there is a lack of understanding of LLMs' abilities in the full promotion process and how these abilities generalize across different tasks and domains. In this work, we introduce ECP-Bench, a benchmark containing 1.9M movie, game, and music items and 423,451 questions across 33 tasks in five content-promotion skill families. Our evaluation shows that frontier models achieve only 51.9\% overall accuracy and lose much of their advantage on post-cutoff content, with drops of up to 19.1 percentage points. In contrast, open-weight models fine-tuned on ECP-Bench achieve up to 60.3\%, remain substantially more stable across the knowledge cutoff, generalize to unseen content and tasks, and exhibit meaningful cross-domain generalization.

cs.IR↗

arXiv2026

IRIS: time-structured manifold projections

High-dimensional biomedical data, such as cell-by-gene matrices, are increasingly generated temporally. However, Manifold Learning algorithms, like t-SNE and UMAP, cannot incorporate time-ordering in their layouts, obfuscating the dynamics of cell types or other classes. As a solution, we present IRIS, a new Manifold Learning algorithm that structures layouts both chronologically and by manifold topology. IRIS can visualize a wide range of dynamic biomedical data, including scRNA-seq, comparative metagenomics, and literature.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

Generative AI Advertising as a Problem of Trustworthy Commercial Intervention

Major deployed generative AI advertising systems preserve a visible boundary between commercial content and AI-generated responses. Yet empirical research shows that ads woven directly into large language model (LLM) outputs often go undetected by users. We argue that generative AI fundamentally changes advertising: rather than placing products into discrete slots, it enables interventions on the generative process itself, which induce commercial influence through less observable channels. This reframes generative AI advertising as a problem of trustworthy intervention rather than content placement. We introduce a taxonomy organized by influence tier, corresponding to interventions on progressively more latent variables: product mentions, information framing, behavioral redirection, and long-term preference shaping; and show how these tiers instantiate across modalities and system architectures, including retrieval-augmented generation and agentic pipelines where upstream decisions can sharply constrain downstream outcomes. Both major deployed systems and designed mechanisms concentrate on the most observable and easiest-to-govern tier, while the forms of commercial influence most consequential for user autonomy remain poorly understood and lack frameworks for detection, measurement, or disclosure. The central challenge is whether commercial influence in generative systems can be made trustworthy, i.e., attributable, measurable, contestable, and aligned with user welfare.

cs.CY↗

arXiv2026

Through the Judge's Eyes: Inferred Thinking Traces Improve Reliability of LLM Raters

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used as raters for evaluation tasks. However, their reliability is often limited for subjective tasks, when human judgments involve subtle reasoning beyond annotation labels. Thinking traces, the reasoning behind a judgment, are highly informative but challenging to collect and curate. We present a human-LLM collaborative framework to infer thinking traces from label-only annotations. The proposed framework uses a simple and effective rejection sampling method to reconstruct these traces at scale. These inferred thinking traces are applied to two complementary tasks: (1) fine-tuning open LLM raters; and (2) synthesizing clearer annotation guidelines for proprietary LLM raters. Across multiple datasets, our methods lead to significantly improved LLM-human agreement. Additionally, the refined annotation guidelines increase agreement among different LLM models. These results suggest that LLMs can serve as practical proxies for otherwise unrevealed human thinking traces, enabling label-only corpora to be extended into thinking-trace-augmented resources that enhance the reliability of LLM raters.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

MedViz: An Agent-based, Visual-guided Research Assistant for Navigating Biomedical Literature

Biomedical researchers face increasing challenges in navigating millions of publications in diverse domains. Traditional search engines typically return articles as ranked text lists, offering little support for global exploration or in-depth analysis. Although recent advances in generative AI and large language models have shown promise in tasks such as summarization, extraction, and question answering, their dialog-based implementations are poorly integrated with literature search workflows. To address this gap, we introduce MedViz, a visual analytics system that integrates multiple AI agents with interactive visualization to support the exploration of the large-scale biomedical literature. MedViz combines a semantic map of millions of articles with agent-driven functions for querying, summarizing, and hypothesis generation, allowing researchers to iteratively refine questions, identify trends, and uncover hidden connections. By bridging intelligent agents with interactive visualization, MedViz transforms biomedical literature search into a dynamic, exploratory process that accelerates knowledge discovery.

cs.IR↗

arXiv2026

Pathways of Thoughts: Multi-Directional Thinking for Long-form Personalized Question Answering

Personalization is well studied in search and recommendation, but personalized question answering remains underexplored due to challenges in inferring preferences from long, noisy, implicit contexts and generating responses that are both accurate and aligned with user expectations. To address this, we propose Pathways of Thoughts (PoT), an inference-stage method that applies to any large language model (LLM) without task-specific fine-tuning. PoT models the thinking as an iterative decision process, where the model dynamically selects among cognitive operations such as reasoning, revision, personalization, and clarification. This enables exploration of multiple reasoning trajectories, producing diverse candidate responses that capture different perspectives. PoT then aggregates and reweights these candidates according to inferred user preferences, yielding a final personalized response that benefits from the complementary strengths of diverse reasoning paths. Experiments on the LaMP-QA benchmark show that PoT consistently outperforms competitive baselines, achieving up to a 10.8\% relative improvement. Human evaluation further validates these improvements, with annotators preferring PoT in 66\% of cases compared to the best-performing baseline and reporting ties in 15\% of cases.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2025

Position: Towards Bidirectional Human-AI Alignment

Recent advances in general-purpose AI underscore the urgent need to align AI systems with human goals and values. Yet, the lack of a clear, shared understanding of what constitutes "alignment" limits meaningful progress and cross-disciplinary collaboration. In this position paper, we argue that the research community should explicitly define and critically reflect on "alignment" to account for the bidirectional and dynamic relationship between humans and AI. Through a systematic review of over 400 papers spanning HCI, NLP, ML, and more, we examine how alignment is currently defined and operationalized. Building on this analysis, we introduce the Bidirectional Human-AI Alignment framework, which not only incorporates traditional efforts to align AI with human values but also introduces the critical, underexplored dimension of aligning humans with AI -- supporting cognitive, behavioral, and societal adaptation to rapidly advancing AI technologies. Our findings reveal significant gaps in current literature, especially in long-term interaction design, human value modeling, and mutual understanding. We conclude with three central challenges and actionable recommendations to guide future research toward more nuanced, reciprocal, and human-AI alignment approaches.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2025

Using Large Language Models to Categorize Strategic Situations and Decipher Motivations Behind Human Behaviors

By varying prompts to a large language model, we can elicit the full range of human behaviors in a variety of different scenarios in classic economic games. By analyzing which prompts elicit which behaviors, we can categorize and compare different strategic situations, which can also help provide insight into what different economic scenarios induce people to think about. We discuss how this provides a first step towards a non-standard method of inferring (deciphering) the motivations behind the human behaviors. We also show how this deciphering process can be used to categorize differences in the behavioral tendencies of different populations.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2025

Be.FM: Open Foundation Models for Human Behavior

Despite their success in numerous fields, the potential of foundation models for modeling and understanding human behavior remains largely unexplored. We introduce Be.FM, one of the first open foundation models designed for human behavior modeling. Built upon open-source large language models and fine-tuned on a diverse range of behavioral data, Be.FM can be used to understand and predict human decision-making. We construct a comprehensive set of benchmark tasks for testing the capabilities of behavioral foundation models. Our results demonstrate that Be.FM can predict behaviors, infer characteristics of individuals and populations, generate insights about contexts, and apply behavioral science knowledge.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2025

ExAnte: A Benchmark for Ex-Ante Inference in Large Language Models

Large language models (LLMs) face significant challenges in ex-ante reasoning, where analysis, inference, or predictions must be made without access to information from future events. Even with explicit prompts enforcing temporal cutoffs, LLMs often generate outputs influenced by internalized knowledge of events beyond the specified cutoff. This paper introduces a novel task and benchmark designed to evaluate the ability of LLMs to reason while adhering to such temporal constraints. The benchmark includes a variety of tasks: stock prediction, Wikipedia event prediction, scientific publication prediction, and Question Answering (QA), designed to assess factual knowledge under temporal cutoff constraints. We use leakage rate to quantify models' reliance on future information beyond cutoff timestamps. Experimental results reveal that LLMs struggle to consistently adhere to temporal cutoffs across common prompting strategies and tasks, demonstrating persistent challenges in ex-ante reasoning. This benchmark provides a potential evaluation framework to advance the development of LLMs' temporal reasoning ability for time-sensitive applications.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2025

Why is constrained neural language generation particularly challenging?

Recent advances in deep neural language models combined with the capacity of large scale datasets have accelerated the development of natural language generation systems that produce fluent and coherent texts (to various degrees of success) in a multitude of tasks and application contexts. However, controlling the output of these models for desired user and task needs is still an open challenge. This is crucial not only to customizing the content and style of the generated language, but also to their safe and reliable deployment in the real world. We present an extensive survey on the emerging topic of constrained neural language generation in which we formally define and categorize the problems of natural language generation by distinguishing between conditions and constraints (the latter being testable conditions on the output text instead of the input), present constrained text generation tasks, and review existing methods and evaluation metrics for constrained text generation. Our aim is to highlight recent progress and trends in this emerging field, informing on the most promising directions and limitations towards advancing the state-of-the-art of constrained neural language generation research.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2025

Efficient Estimation of Shortest-Path Distance Distributions to Samples in Graphs

As large graph datasets become increasingly common across many fields, sampling is often needed to reduce the graphs into manageable sizes. This procedure raises critical questions about representativeness as no sample can capture the properties of the original graph perfectly, and different parts of the graph are not evenly affected by the loss. Recent work has shown that the distances from the non-sampled nodes to the sampled nodes can be a quantitative indicator of bias and fairness in graph machine learning. However, to our knowledge, there is no method for evaluating how a sampling method affects the distribution of shortest-path distances without actually performing the sampling and shortest-path calculation. In this paper, we present an accurate and efficient framework for estimating the distribution of shortest-path distances to the sample, applicable to a wide range of sampling methods and graph structures. Our framework is faster than empirical methods and only requires the specification of degree distributions. We also extend our framework to handle graphs with community structures. While this introduces a decrease in accuracy, we demonstrate that our framework remains highly accurate on downstream comparison-based tasks. Code is publicly available at https://github.com/az1326/shortest_paths.

cs.SI↗

arXiv2025

Bridging AI and Science: Implications from a Large-Scale Literature Analysis of AI4Science

Artificial Intelligence has proven to be a transformative tool for advancing scientific research across a wide range of disciplines. However, a significant gap still exists between AI and scientific communities, limiting the full potential of AI methods in driving broad scientific discovery. Existing efforts in identifying and bridging this gap have often relied on qualitative examination of small samples of literature, offering a limited perspective on the broader AI4Science landscape. In this work, we present a large-scale analysis of the AI4Science literature, starting by using large language models to identify scientific problems and AI methods in publications from top science and AI venues. Leveraging this new dataset, we quantitatively highlight key disparities between AI methods and scientific problems, revealing substantial opportunities for deeper AI integration across scientific disciplines. Furthermore, we explore the potential and challenges of facilitating collaboration between AI and scientific communities through the lens of link prediction. Our findings and tools aim to promote more impactful interdisciplinary collaborations and accelerate scientific discovery through deeper and broader AI integration. Our code and dataset are available at: https://github.com/charles-pyj/Bridging-AI-and-Science.

cs.AI↗