arXiv subjects

Wenting Zhao

Publications and source records attributed to Wenting Zhao.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

arXiv2026

VoiceAgentRAG: Solving the RAG Latency Bottleneck in Real-Time Voice Agents Using Dual-Agent Architectures

We present VoiceAgentRAG, an open-source dual-agent memory router that decouples retrieval from response generation. A background Slow Thinker agent continuously monitors the conversation stream, predicts likely follow-up topics using an LLM, and pre-fetches relevant document chunks into a FAISS-backed semantic cache. A foreground Fast Talker agent reads only from this sub-millisecond cache, bypassing the vector database entirely on cache hits.

cs.SD↗

arXiv2026

Qwen3-Coder-Next Technical Report

We present Qwen3-Coder-Next, an open-weight language model specialized for coding agents. Qwen3-Coder-Next is an 80-billion-parameter model that activates only 3 billion parameters during inference, enabling strong coding capability with efficient inference. In this work, we explore how far strong training recipes can push the capability limits of models with small parameter footprints. To achieve this, we perform agentic training through large-scale synthesis of verifiable coding tasks paired with executable environments, allowing learning directly from environment feedback via mid-training and reinforcement learning. Across agent-centric benchmarks including SWE-Bench and Terminal-Bench, Qwen3-Coder-Next achieves competitive performance relative to its active parameter count. We release both base and instruction-tuned open-weight versions to support research and real-world coding agent development.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

AudioCapBench: Quick Evaluation on Audio Captioning across Sound, Music, and Speech

We introduce AudioCapBench, a benchmark for evaluating audio captioning capabilities of large multimodal models. \method covers three distinct audio domains, including environmental sound, music, and speech, with 1,000 curated evaluation samples drawn from established datasets. We evaluate 13 models across two providers (OpenAI, Google Gemini) using both reference-based metrics (METEOR, BLEU, ROUGE-L) and an LLM-as-Judge framework that scores predictions on three orthogonal dimensions: \textit{accuracy} (semantic correctness), \textit{completeness} (coverage of reference content), and \textit{hallucination} (absence of fabricated content). Our results reveal that Gemini models generally outperform OpenAI models on overall captioning quality, with Gemini~3~Pro achieving the highest overall score (6.00/10), while OpenAI models exhibit lower hallucination rates. All models perform best on speech captioning and worst on music captioning. We release the benchmark as well as evaluation code to facilitate reproducible audio understanding research.

cs.SD↗

arXiv2026

Scaling Agentic Verifier for Competitive Coding

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong coding capabilities but still struggle to solve competitive programming problems correctly in a single attempt. Execution-based re-ranking offers a promising test-time scaling strategy, yet existing methods are constrained by either difficult test case generation or inefficient random input sampling. To address this limitation, we propose Agentic Verifier, an execution-based agent that actively reasons about program behaviors and searches for highly discriminative test inputs that expose behavioral discrepancies among candidate solutions. Through multi-turn interaction with code execution environments, the verifier iteratively refines the candidate input generator and produces targeted counterexamples rather than blindly sampling inputs. We train the verifier to acquire this discriminative input generation capability via a scalable pipeline combining large-scale data synthesis, rejection fine-tuning, and agentic reinforcement learning. Extensive experiments across five competitive programming benchmarks demonstrate consistent improvements over strong execution-based baselines, achieving up to +10-15% absolute gains in Best@K accuracy. Further analysis reveals clear test-time scaling behavior and highlights the verifier's broader potential beyond reranking.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2025

SweRank+: Multilingual, Multi-Turn Code Ranking for Software Issue Localization

Maintaining large-scale, multilingual codebases hinges on accurately localizing issues, which requires mapping natural-language error descriptions to the relevant functions that need to be modified. However, existing ranking approaches are often Python-centric and perform a single-pass search over the codebase. This work introduces SweRank+, a framework that couples SweRankMulti, a cross-lingual code ranking tool, with SweRankAgent, an agentic search setup, for iterative, multi-turn reasoning over the code repository. SweRankMulti comprises a code embedding retriever and a listwise LLM reranker, and is trained using a carefully curated large-scale issue localization dataset spanning multiple popular programming languages. SweRankAgent adopts an agentic search loop that moves beyond single-shot localization with a memory buffer to reason and accumulate relevant localization candidates over multiple turns. Our experiments on issue localization benchmarks spanning various languages demonstrate new state-of-the-art performance with SweRankMulti, while SweRankAgent further improves localization over single-pass ranking.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2025

Self-Abstraction from Grounded Experience for Plan-Guided Policy Refinement

Large language model (LLM) based agents are increasingly used to tackle software engineering tasks that require multi-step reasoning and code modification, demonstrating promising yet limited performance. However, most existing LLM agents typically operate within static execution frameworks, lacking a principled mechanism to learn and self-improve from their own experience and past rollouts. As a result, their performance remains bounded by the initial framework design and the underlying LLM's capabilities. We propose Self-Abstraction from Grounded Experience (SAGE), a framework that enables agents to learn from their own task executions and refine their behavior through self-abstraction. After an initial rollout, the agent induces a concise plan abstraction from its grounded experience, distilling key steps, dependencies, and constraints. This learned abstraction is then fed back as contextual guidance, refining the agent's policy and supporting more structured, informed subsequent executions. Empirically, SAGE delivers consistent performance gains across diverse LLM backbones and agent architectures. Notably, it yields a 7.2% relative performance improvement over the strong Mini-SWE-Agent baseline when paired with the GPT-5 (high) backbone. SAGE further achieves strong overall performance on SWE-Bench Verified benchmark, reaching 73.2% and 74% Pass@1 resolve rates with the Mini-SWE-Agent and OpenHands CodeAct agent framework, respectively.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2025

SPICE: Self-Play In Corpus Environments Improves Reasoning

Self-improving systems require environmental interaction for continuous adaptation. We introduce SPICE (Self-Play In Corpus Environments), a reinforcement learning framework where a single model acts in two roles: a Challenger that mines documents from a large corpus to generate diverse reasoning tasks, and a Reasoner that solves them. Through adversarial dynamics, the Challenger creates an automatic curriculum at the frontier of the Reasoner's capability, while corpus grounding provides the rich, near-inexhaustible external signal necessary for sustained improvement. Unlike existing ungrounded self-play methods that offer more limited benefits, SPICE achieves consistent gains across mathematical (+8.9%) and general reasoning (+9.8%) benchmarks on multiple model families. Our analysis reveals how document grounding is a key ingredient in SPICE to continuously generate its own increasingly challenging goals and achieve them, enabling sustained self-improvement.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2025

Refactoring Codebases through Library Design

Maintainable and general software allows developers to build robust applications efficiently, yet achieving these qualities often requires refactoring specialized solutions into reusable components. This challenge becomes particularly relevant as code agents become used to solve isolated one-off programming problems. We investigate code agents' capacity to refactor code in ways that support growth and reusability. We first investigate what makes a good refactoring, finding via simulation results and a human study that Minimum Description Length best correlates with preferable refactorings. We then present both a benchmark and a method for refactoring: MiniCode, a benchmark where multiple files must be refactored into a shared library, and Librarian, a sample-and-rerank method for generating reusable libraries. We compare Librarian to state-of-the-art library generation methods, and study it on real-world code bases.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2025

The Era of Real-World Human Interaction: RL from User Conversations

We posit that to achieve continual model improvement and multifaceted alignment, future models must learn from natural human interaction. Current conversational models are aligned using pre-annotated, expert-generated human feedback. In this work, we introduce Reinforcement Learning from Human Interaction (RLHI), a paradigm that learns directly from in-the-wild user conversations. We develop two complementary methods: (1) RLHI with User-Guided Rewrites, which revises unsatisfactory model outputs based on users' natural-language follow-up responses, (2) RLHI with User-Based Rewards, which learns via a reward model conditioned on knowledge of the user's long-term interaction history (termed persona). Together, these methods link long-term user personas to turn-level preferences via persona-conditioned preference optimization. Trained on conversations derived from WildChat, both RLHI variants outperform strong baselines in personalization and instruction-following, and similar feedback enhances performance on reasoning benchmarks. These results suggest organic human interaction offers scalable, effective supervision for personalized alignment.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2025

Normalized solution for Kirchhoff equation with upper critical exponent and mixed Choquard type nonlinearities

In this paper, we consider the existence of normalized solution to the following Kirchhoff equation with mixed Choquard type nonlinearities: \begin{equation*} \begin{cases} -\left(a + b \int_{\mathbb{R}^3} |\nabla u|^2 \, dx\right) Δu - λu = μ|u|^{q-2} u + (I_α* |u|^{α+ 3}) |u|^{α+1} u, \quad x \in \mathbb{R}^3, \\ \int_{\mathbb{R}^3} u^2 \, dx = ρ^2, \end{cases} \end{equation*} where $a,b,ρ>0$, $α\in \left(0, 3\right)$, $\frac{14}{3} < q < 6$ and $λ\in \mathbb{R}$ will arise as a Lagrange multiplier. The quantity $α+ 3$ here represents the upper critical exponent relevant to the Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev inequality, and this exponent can be regarded as equivalent to the Sobolev critical exponent $2^*$. We generalize the results by Wang et al.(Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2025), which focused on nonlinear Kirchhoff equations with combined nonlinearities when $2< q< \frac{10}{3}$. The primary challenge lies in the necessity for subtle energy estimates under the $L^2$-constraint to achieve compactness recovery. Meanwhile, we need to deal with the difficulties created by the two nonlocal terms appearing in the equation.

math.AP↗

arXiv2025

The Majority is not always right: RL training for solution aggregation

Scaling up test-time compute, by generating multiple independent solutions and selecting or aggregating among them, has become a central paradigm for improving large language models (LLMs) on challenging reasoning tasks. While most prior work relies on simple majority voting or reward model ranking to aggregate solutions, these approaches may only yield limited benefits. In this work, we propose to learn aggregation as an explicit reasoning skill: given a set of candidate solutions, we train an aggregator model to review, reconcile, and synthesize a final, correct answer using reinforcement learning from verifiable rewards. A key ingredient is careful balancing of easy and hard training examples, allowing the model to learn both to recover minority-but-correct answers as well as easy majority-correct answers. Empirically, we find our method, AggLM, outperforms both strong rule-based and reward-model baselines, across multiple benchmarks. Furthermore, it generalizes effectively to solutions from differing models, including stronger ones than contained in the training data, all while requiring substantially fewer tokens than majority voting with larger numbers of solutions.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2025

StepWiser: Stepwise Generative Judges for Wiser Reasoning

As models increasingly leverage multi-step reasoning strategies to solve complex problems, supervising the logical validity of these intermediate steps has become a critical research challenge. Process reward models address this by providing step-by-step feedback, but current approaches have two major drawbacks: they typically function as classifiers without providing explanations, and their reliance on supervised fine-tuning with static datasets limits generalization. Inspired by recent advances, we reframe stepwise reward modeling from a classification task to a reasoning task itself. We thus propose a generative judge that reasons about the policy model's reasoning steps (i.e., meta-reasons), outputting thinking tokens before delivering a final verdict. Our model, StepWiser, is trained by reinforcement learning using relative outcomes of rollouts. We show it provides (i) better judgment accuracy on intermediate steps than existing methods; (ii) can be used to improve the policy model at training time; and (iii) improves inference-time search.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2025

Quantum sensing of Lanthandie binding tags with relaxometer of NV center in diamond

Lanthanide binding tags (LBTs) stand out as a prominent group of fluorescent probes that are extensively utilized in biological detection. However, research on LBTs has predominantly emphasized their fluorescence properties, which frequently compromised by background fluorescence noise. Investigating magnetic properties could optimize detection methodologies that offer enhanced sensitivity and specificity. In this study, we measured the response of a relaxometer based on ensemble nitrogen-vacancy (NV) centers in diamond to various amounts of LBTs with gadolinium ions, determining the detection limit of LBTs to be 25 fmol. We then proposed and demonstrated a detection scheme employing the NV relaxometer to detect specific binding between LBTs and target. Specifically, we assessed the relaxometer's response to various concentrations of the interaction between the modified LBTs and Receptor-Binding Domain (RBD) of SARS-COVID-2 spike protein, with the detection threshold reaching ~1 pmol. Our research provides a potential application platform for biomarker detection under picomole concentration by using NV centers to detect the magnetism of LBTs.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2025

Multi-Turn Code Generation Through Single-Step Rewards

We address the problem of code generation from multi-turn execution feedback. Existing methods either generate code without feedback or use complex, hierarchical reinforcement learning to optimize multi-turn rewards. We propose a simple yet scalable approach, $μ$Code, that solves multi-turn code generation using only single-step rewards. Our key insight is that code generation is a one-step recoverable MDP, where the correct code can be recovered from any intermediate code state in a single turn. $μ$Code iteratively trains both a generator to provide code solutions conditioned on multi-turn execution feedback and a verifier to score the newly generated code. Experimental evaluations show that our approach achieves significant improvements over the state-of-the-art baselines. We provide analysis of the design choices of the reward models and policy, and show the efficacy of $μ$Code at utilizing the execution feedback. Our code is available at https://github.com/portal-cornell/muCode.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2025

Are Triggers Needed for Document-Level Event Extraction?

Most existing work on event extraction has focused on sentence-level texts and presumes the identification of a trigger-span -- a word or phrase in the input that evokes the occurrence of an event of interest. Event arguments are then extracted with respect to the trigger. Indeed, triggers are treated as integral to, and trigger detection as an essential component of, event extraction. In this paper, we provide the first investigation of the role of triggers for the more difficult and much less studied task of document-level event extraction. We analyze their usefulness in multiple end-to-end and pipelined transformer-based event extraction models for three document-level event extraction datasets, measuring performance using triggers of varying quality (human-annotated, LLM-generated, keyword-based, and random). We find that whether or not systems benefit from explicitly extracting triggers depends both on dataset characteristics (i.e. the typical number of events per document) and task-specific information available during extraction (i.e. natural language event schemas). Perhaps surprisingly, we also observe that the mere existence of triggers in the input, even random ones, is important for prompt-based in-context learning approaches to the task.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2024

Challenges in Trustworthy Human Evaluation of Chatbots

Open community-driven platforms like Chatbot Arena that collect user preference data from site visitors have gained a reputation as one of the most trustworthy publicly available benchmarks for LLM performance. While now standard, it is tricky to implement effective guardrails to collect high-quality annotations from humans. In this paper, we demonstrate that three sources of bad annotations, both malicious and otherwise, can corrupt the reliability of open leaderboard rankings. In particular, we show that only 10\% of poor quality votes by apathetic (site visitors not appropriately incentivized to give correct votes) or adversarial (bad actors seeking to inflate the ranking of a target model) annotators can change the rankings of models by up to 5 places on the leaderboard. Finally, we discuss open challenges in ensuring high-quality human annotations.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2024

Can Large Language Models Serve as Evaluators for Code Summarization?

Code summarization facilitates program comprehension and software maintenance by converting code snippets into natural-language descriptions. Over the years, numerous methods have been developed for this task, but a key challenge remains: effectively evaluating the quality of generated summaries. While human evaluation is effective for assessing code summary quality, it is labor-intensive and difficult to scale. Commonly used automatic metrics, such as BLEU, ROUGE-L, METEOR, and BERTScore, often fail to align closely with human judgments. In this paper, we explore the potential of Large Language Models (LLMs) for evaluating code summarization. We propose CODERPE (Role-Player for Code Summarization Evaluation), a novel method that leverages role-player prompting to assess the quality of generated summaries. Specifically, we prompt an LLM agent to play diverse roles, such as code reviewer, code author, code editor, and system analyst. Each role evaluates the quality of code summaries across key dimensions, including coherence, consistency, fluency, and relevance. We further explore the robustness of LLMs as evaluators by employing various prompting strategies, including chain-of-thought reasoning, in-context learning, and tailored rating form designs. The results demonstrate that LLMs serve as effective evaluators for code summarization methods. Notably, our LLM-based evaluator, CODERPE , achieves an 81.59% Spearman correlation with human evaluations, outperforming the existing BERTScore metric by 17.27%.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2024

Commit0: Library Generation from Scratch

With the goal of benchmarking generative systems beyond expert software development ability, we introduce Commit0, a benchmark that challenges AI agents to write libraries from scratch. Agents are provided with a specification document outlining the library's API as well as a suite of interactive unit tests, with the goal of producing an implementation of this API accordingly. The implementation is validated through running these unit tests. As a benchmark, Commit0 is designed to move beyond static one-shot code generation towards agents that must process long-form natural language specifications, adapt to multi-stage feedback, and generate code with complex dependencies. Commit0 also offers an interactive environment where models receive static analysis and execution feedback on the code they generate. Our experiments demonstrate that while current agents can pass some unit tests, none can yet fully reproduce full libraries. Results also show that interactive feedback is quite useful for models to generate code that passes more unit tests, validating the benchmarks that facilitate its use.

cs.SE↗