SEARCH · Search arXiv

Results for “math.LO”

Search indexed arXiv papers on artificial intelligence, large language models, computer vision and robotics. Read source abstracts and follow links to arXiv.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

996 records · Page 4Linked to original sources

arXiv2026

AirFM-DDA: Air-Interface Foundation Model in the Delay-Doppler-Angle Domain for AI-Native 6G

The success of large foundation models is catalyzing a new paradigm for AI-native 6G network design: wireless foundation models for physical-layer design. However, existing models often operate on channel state information (CSI) in the spatial-temporal-frequency (STF) domain, where multipath components are superimposed and structurally entangled. This hinders the learning of a universal channel representation. Their reliance on global attention also incurs prohibitive overhead. In this paper, we propose AirFM-DDA, an Air-interface Foundation Model in the Delay-Doppler-Angle (DDA) domain. AirFM-DDA reparameterizes CSI into the DDA domain to resolve multipath components along physically meaningful axes and employs window-based attention with frame-structure-aware positional encoding. Extensive experiments demonstrate transferability across scenarios, tasks, datasets, and antenna configurations. For channel prediction and estimation, AirFM-DDA generalizes zero-shot to unseen cities, achieving average normalized mean-square error (NMSE) gains of 4.9-8.5 dB over the strongest baselines. With only 10% labeled data, it achieves average gains of 12.0 percentage points in Top-1 accuracy for beam prediction and 3.4 percentage points in F1 score for line-of-sight (LoS) identification. It further transfers across simulated datasets and adapts to measured data and different antenna arrays. Compared with global attention, window-based attention reduces training and inference costs by nearly an order of magnitude.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

Target Discounted Sum Problem on Markov Chains with Applications to Markov Decision Processes

The discounted sum is a way to aggregate a sequence of weights from a finite alphabet $Σ$, i.e., for a discount factor $λ$, the discounted sum of a sequence $w_0 w_1 w_2 \cdots$ over $Σ$ is $\sum_{i \in \mathbb{N}} w_i λ^i$. The target discounted-sum problem, which is currently open, asks, given $λ,Σ$ and a target $t$, whether there exists an infinite sequence over $Σ$ whose discounted sum is equal to $t$. We study and solve a probabilistic variant of this problem, i.e., the target discounted-sum problem on Markov chains. To do this, we prove that the event consisting of paths whose discounted sum is equal to the target and has infinitely many distinct suffix sums has probability zero. This structural property allows us to solve the target discounted-sum problem on Markov chains using an automata-theoretic technique. We apply our technical results to Markov decision processes with target discounted-sum objectives: we show that the infimum value and the finite-memory supremum value are computable in pseudo-polynomial time and are attained by deterministic finite-memory strategies.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2026

Factorized Boolean representations for efficient quantum synthesis

Quantum algorithms promise advantages beyond classical reach, but running them on error-corrected hardware requires translating Boolean specifications into reversible circuits, and the resources that translation demands determine what is executable. Established methods minimize a Boolean expression and map it to a circuit, assuming the minimized form is best. Here we show that minimized expressions retain algebraic structure minimization cannot reach, arising from containment and complementary-polarity relationships among their terms, and that extracting it yields circuits cheaper to execute despite having more operations. The decisive quantity is not a circuit's operation count but the control count of its widest operation, a superlinear cost; extracting shared factors trades a few wide operations for many narrow ones and reduces qubit count. Across benchmarks and oracles from quantum search and factoring algorithms, at the representation level the transformation never increases either cost measure, a guarantee from its construction. Translation to an executable circuit returns part of that advantage, since auxiliary lines must be uncomputed, yet the factorized circuit still left a leading circuit-level optimizer reaching lower final counts, and faster, than unaided. The representation of a computation is therefore itself a resource, optimizable before compilation and distinct from both logic minimization and circuit-level optimization.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2026

The Complexity of Coverability-Like Problems in Elementary Object Systems: Data-Nets to the Rescue

Elementary Object Systems (EOSs) are a model in the nets-within-nets (NWNs) paradigm, where tokens in turn can host standard Petri nets. We study the complexity of coverability-like problems, including termination and boundedness, over EOSs. Since coverability and boundedness are undecidable in general on EOSs, we focus on the relevant fragment of conservative EOSs (cEOSs). Our technique interprets cEOSs into the framework of data nets, whose tokens carry data from an infinite domain, thus bridging the nesting and the data-aware paradigms. Specifically, we show that cEOS coverability-like problems are equivalent to the coverability-like problems over an interesting fragment, called channel-$ν$PNs (c-$ν$PNs), of data nets that extends $ν$PN (featuring globally fresh name creation) with restricted forms of transfers with renaming. c-$ν$PNs remain less expressive than Unordered Data Nets, which feature lossy name creation as well as powerful forms of whole-place operations and broadcasts. These reductions allow us to analyze cEOS coverability taking advantage of known results on data nets. We conclude that the complexity of cEOS coverability is double-Ackermanian, $\mathcal{F}_{ω2}$-complete, while termination and boundedness are non-primitive recursive.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2026

Antichains for Concurrent Parameterized Games (Long Version)

Concurrent parameterized games involve a fixed yet arbitrary number of players. They are described by finite arenas in which the edges are labeled with languages that describe the possible move combinations leading from one vertex to another (n players yield a word of length n). Previous work showed that, when edge labels are regular languages, one can decide whether a distinguished player, called Eve, has a strategy to ensure a reachability objective, against any strategy profile of her arbitrarily many opponents. This decision problem is known to be PSPACE-complete. A basic ingredient in the PSPACE-membership proof is the reduction to the exponential-size knowledge game, a 2-player game that reflects the knowledge Eve has on the number of opponents. In this paper, we provide a symbolic approach, based on antichains, to compute Eve's winning region in the knowledge game. In words, it gives the minimal knowledge Eve needs at every vertex to win the concurrent parameterized reachability game. More precisely, we propose two fixed-point algorithms that compute, as an antichain, the maximal elements of the winning region for Eve in the knowledge game. We implemented these two algorithms in C++, as well as the one initially proposed, and report on their relative performances on various benchmarks.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2026

Predictive Zonotope Reduction: Precise Runtime Monitoring under Uncertainty

Robots operating in physical environments make control decisions based on uncertain sensor measurements, which can lead to unsafe or suboptimal actions. Runtime monitors that check their behavior against safety specifications must represent this uncertainty soundly. Zonotopes are a widely used representation, but continuously incorporating new measurements grows their order unboundedly, so monitors must periodically apply an over-approximating reduction. The choice of the reduction method substantially affects the zonotope's precision, yet existing approaches typically utilize a fixed method throughout the run, even though the optimal choice depends on the current state. This paper presents a Predictive Zonotope Reduction (PZR) approach, which frames reducer selection as an optimal control problem and solves it using beam-search model predictive control. Policy distillation into a small neural policy further provides substantially higher execution speed than model predictive control while maintaining improved performance, enabling uncertainty-aware runtime monitoring on resource-constrained real-time systems. We implement our approach in the RLola runtime monitoring framework and evaluate it on a 5-degree-of-freedom robotic arm simulated in MuJoCo, with sensor uncertainty modeled according to ISO 5725. Experiments on a Raspberry Pi 5 show that dynamic reduction significantly lowers false-positive rates in monitoring compared with static reduction strategies.

cs.RO↗

arXiv2026

sheval: An RDF data shapes evaluation tool and test-suite for recursive shapes

Two different languages have been developed to validate RDF data based on the concept of a shape: ShEx and SHACL. In each language it is possible to define a shape that refers to itself, which is called a recursive shape. While in the case of ShEx, the semantics of recursive shapes is well defined and is part of the specification, in the case of SHACL, the semantics of recursive shapes is left to the implementation of the different SHACL engines. Consequently, the different SHACL engines show different behaviours when confronted with recursive shapes. In this paper we present sheval: an evaluation framework consisting of a tool and a test suite that can be used to compare the behaviour of different shapes technologies when confronted with recursive definitions. The tool has been used to evaluate and understand the differences in the implementation of recursive shapes in ShEx and SHACL. It provides a framework for testing and comparing the behaviour of different shape engines, helping to identify inconsistencies and potential issues, and providing a basis for further research and development in the field of shape-based validation of RDF data.

cs.DB↗

arXiv2026

AxQM: A Textbook-Scale Benchmark for Formal Proof Synthesis in a Library of Finite-Dimensional Quantum Mechanics

Formalizing mathematics in a proof assistant, where a machine checks every definition, statement and proof, has set a new standard of rigor. Large language models are now capable of formalizing autonomously, even at the scale of whole textbooks. We bring this standard of rigor to physics, where theoretical arguments carry idealizations that are rarely stated fully, and any logical gaps could have a cascading effect on interdependent results. Recognizing the need to evaluate autoformalization systems for physics, we release AxQM, 1,019 kernel-checkable proof-synthesis tasks over 479 items drawn from the textbook Quantum Computation and Quantum Information by Nielsen and Chuang. The tasks are stated in a custom Lean library of finite-dimensional quantum mechanics. By task count, it is the largest proof-synthesis benchmark in physics by a factor of four. AxQM is derived from a near-complete formalization of the formal portions of the textbook, so every task is guaranteed a solution, which we keep private. Grading of the benchmark is done deterministically by the Lean kernel, which checks that the proof compiles, that no sorry appears in it or in any declaration it depends on, and that it introduces no new axioms.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2026

Self-extensional logics of formal inconsistency: Decidability and limits for paraconsistency

RmbC is a self-extensional paraconsistent logic in the family of Logics of Formal Inconsistency (LFIs). This system is obtained from mbC (the basic LFI) by adding the replacement property via two global inference rules. RmbC is characterized by a non-explosive negation $\neg$ and a consistency operator $\circ$, which recovers the principle of explosion in a controlled way. Together with its principal axiomatic extensions, RmbC admits a standard Lindenbaum--Tarski algebraization, with Boolean algebras with LFI operators (BALFIs) as its algebraic semantics. In this paper, we study how far this self-extensional paraconsistent behavior can be extended axiomatically, starting from RmbC. We classify pairs of very natural consistency axioms according to whether they preserve paraconsistency or force classical collapse; identify six algebraically equivalent explosive cores; and isolate a separate structural obstruction for the combination of excluded middle for $\neg$ with an involutive negation. We also investigate, for the first time, the decidability of this family of self-extensional LFIs. As a first result, we prove the finite model property for RmbC with respect to BALFI semantics via an algebraic filtration, which yields decidability, and transfer this result to several paraconsistent axiomatic extensions of RmbC. Finally, we establish a 2-EXPTIME upper bound for the validity problem of RmbC and a coNP-hardness lower bound.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2026

Extending concurrent separation logic to the hardware level to verify the xv6 OS kernel on RISC-V with AI agents

MachCSL is a framework for verifying systems software, such as an OS kernel, on top of low-level semantics of a RISC-V computer, based on the Sail RISC-V semantics. The key idea behind MachCSL is to adapt concurrent separation logic, based on Iris, to reasoning about low-level hardware execution at the sub-instruction level: page-table translation, TLB, privilege levels, configuration registers, instruction fetch/decode/execute, traps and interrupts, DMA, shared memory, power failures, etc. Reasoning at this level of detail ensures that the system software correctly manages all of the hardware details. Verifying software at this low level of abstraction is tedious, but LLM-based agents are capable of reasoning about such low-level details. As a case study, we verify the xv6 OS kernel (6,593 lines of C and assembly code), which provides a traditional Unix system call interface (processes, file system, file descriptors, and preemptive scheduling) and has substantial internal concurrency (multi-core support with fine-grained locking, shared memory, interrupts, DMA, etc.). In the verification process, we uncovered nine bugs in the xv6 implementation, as well as one bug in the Sail RISC-V semantics. The verification effort took us 77 days, including the time to develop the MachCSL framework.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2026

Schwarz: Solver-Aware Agentic Program Verification

Agentic verification systems can often generate source-level specifications that look plausible, but plausibility is not enough: the verifier must still turn those specifications into SMT obligations that the solver can prove. When this step fails, current LLM-driven loops usually expose only a coarse verifier error, timeout, or unknown solver result. The model cannot tell whether the specification is wrong, a helper lemma is missing, the proof context contains irrelevant facts, or the obligation needs a different theory view. This paper presents Schwarz, an agentic verification harness that makes SMT-backed proof failure local, checkable, and repairable. Schwarz turns failed verification into obligation-local repair tasks: program-point snapshots expose checked facts at a boundary, local lemmas let the agent propose missing proof steps, and theory-aware solver policies guide the agent toward solver-friendly formulations for numeric, quantified, memory, and floating-point obligations. We implement Schwarz for C and Rust/Verus and evaluate it on 1,475 tasks. On 475 benchmarks from recent agentic verification tools, Schwarz solves 95.2% of the tasks. On 1,000 tasks from the SV-COMP 2026 ReachSafety track, averaging 1,427 LOC, Schwarz solves 91.5% of the tasks, compared with 60.1% for CPAchecker. Ablations and comparison with a pure-agent baseline show that solver-aware repair is effective and scalable.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2026

Beyond Compilation: Evaluating Faithful Natural-Language-to-Lean Statement Formalization

Lean verifies that a generated declaration is well typed, but not that it expresses the statement a user intended. We study two questions for autoformalization without canonical Lean targets: whether LLM judges can provide a usable proxy for human semantic review, and how much compilation overstates faithfulness across systems. Our criterion combines Lean compilation with strict semantic consensus between GPT-5.2 and Gemini-2.5-Pro. On an independently audited random sample, it agrees with human majority on 89.7\% of cases (Wilson 95\% CI: 82.1--94.3\%). Across eight systems evaluated on 400 graduate-level statements, every system has a nonzero compile--faithfulness gap, whose observed magnitude ranges from 3.0 to 29.0 percentage points. The full GPT-5.2 tool-augmented agent shows the largest gap, compiling 89.5\% while satisfying the semantic criterion on 60.5\%. Human review, an independent third-family judge, and a BEq formal cross-check provide complementary evidence that the accepted core is reliable and that most audited outputs in the gap are genuine semantic mismatches. A secondary $2^3$ factorial analysis shows that elaboration feedback is the largest validity intervention, yet does not eliminate semantic drift. LLM judging is therefore useful as a human-calibrated, conservative aggregate measure, not as an equivalence oracle.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

Accountable AI with Grounded, Faithful, Consistent, Actionable Rationales: A Case Study in Clinical Trial Matching with VERDICT

Accountability means a decision can be examined, justified, and contested. LLMs make this hard: fluent output may be ungrounded, incomplete, or unfaithful to the decision process. Achieving accountability requires verified rationales (how was the decision reached), assumptions (what was assumed rather than known), policy consistency (the same treatment for the same facts), and pivotal conditions (what would change the outcome). We introduce self-faithfulness as an automatic test of accountability: changing the pivotal conditions should change the decision. We examine accountable AI through clinical trial matching, a high-stakes task central to evidence-based medicine. Although LLM-based matchers match patients to trials reasonably accurately, they apply decision policies inconsistently and produce rationales that are unfaithful to their own decisions. We introduce VERDICT, an LLM-based agent that translates a decision task, its constraints, and its policy into Satisfiability Modulo Theories (SMT), then derives the decision with SMT and MaxSMT solvers -- so policies are applied consistently and decisions are accountable by construction. Across a SIGIR 2016-derived dataset and TREC 2021, VERDICT achieves the strongest decision accuracy among LLM-only and neurosymbolic baselines, applies policies with perfect consistency, and produces clinician-preferred rationales grounded in explicit assumptions and pivotal conditions, with improved counterfactual self-faithfulness.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

PIE-APT: Abductive Planning over Temporal Dynamic Knowledge Graphs via Incremental Reasoning

Planning over Temporal Dynamic Knowledge Graphs (TDKGs) presents theoretical challenges in open-world environments with incomplete information. Existing action formalisms often face decidability issues and the Ramification Problem, while structural abduction requires expansive combinatorial search spaces. We introduce a unified framework with two modules--PIE-Abducer (incremental direct-derivation abduction) and PIE-APT (Abductive Planning for TDKGs)--operating natively on the expressive SROIQ Description Logic. Modeling state transitions as non-monotonic updates to deductively closed DL theories, we represent actions natively in OWL. This leverages an incremental reasoner to preserve decidability and natively bypass the Ramification Problem. To address incomplete knowledge, PIE-Abducer circumvents Minimal Hitting Set (MHS) enumeration. Instead of combinatorial search, it injects the logical negation of a goal into a consistent DL branch and synthesizes missing premises via direct refutation consequences. PIE-APT employs a recursive Generate-and-Test architecture, interleaving backward-chaining A* search with PIE-Abducer to synthesize both action sequences and abductive assumptions. Candidates undergo strict validation via forward-chaining Temporal Projection to evaluate logical trajectories. We evaluate four OWL benchmarks targeting semantic abilities missing from classical planning: parameterized goals with witness search, mid-search DL entailment, open-world assumption injection, and adversarial plan synthesis. Results show qualitative superiority over classical planners and prove our direct-derivation approach significantly outperforms an MHS-faithful baseline in abductive enrichment.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

Adaptive Strategies for GR(1) Games

We consider two-player GR(1) games on graphs, where the system player Eve must satisfy \[ \Box\Diamond A_1\land\cdots\land\Box\Diamond A_m \;\implies\; \Box\Diamond G_1\land\cdots\land\Box\Diamond G_n \] against the environment player Adam. Here $A_1,\ldots,A_m$ are assumptions on the environment, $G_1,\ldots,G_n$ are guarantees the system must provide, and $\Box\Diamond S$ denotes ``always eventually $S$''. Traditional static strategies are overly conservative: they may actively violate assumptions to trivially satisfy the implication, or abandon all guarantees when any assumption is violated. Existing methods to prevent such behaviors incur doubly exponential blowup. We introduce an adaptive framework treating Adam as a non-adversarial agent with unknown objectives. Eve monitors which assumptions Adam actually meets and adapts her strategy at runtime to maximize satisfied guarantees. Central to our approach is a novel algorithm for monitoring liveness properties $\Box\Diamond S$, enabling Eve to maintain real-time likelihood estimates of which assumptions will be fulfilled. Eve pre-computes strategies optimal for different assumption subsets, deploying a probability distribution over them that dynamically adjusts based on monitor outputs. We prove that when assumptions are violated, Eve's randomized adaptive strategy converges asymptotically to the deterministic strategy maximizing guarantees. A prototype demonstrates effectiveness and superior computational performance compared to the state of the art.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2026

A homotopy-type-theoretic generalization of neurosymbolic inference

A wide range of neurosymbolic (NeSy) systems compute one functional: a belief-weighted sum of a logical quantity over a space of $σ$-structures, of which weighted model counting, fuzzy logic, and probabilistic logic are special cases. This account is built on sets, and a set deliberately forgets two things that are important for NeSy: when two $σ$-structures are the same up to a symmetry of the theory, and how many distinct proofs witness a query. Types, in the sense of homotopy type theory, preserve this information and turn the functional into a belief-weighted homotopy cardinality, a notion of size that counts each object in inverse proportion to its symmetries. We develop the framework from scratch for NeSy systems, prove a conservativity theorem that recovers the classical functional when symmetries are trivial, and show that the symmetry our framework exposes is exactly the one behind reasoning shortcuts. The payoff is concrete: the shortcut-aware concept posterior that recent methods reach by ensembling or expressive density estimation is the only symmetry-invariant point of the confusion-set simplex, computable in closed form by averaging a single model over the symmetry group. On MNIST reasoning-shortcut benchmarks this single-model wrapper is better calibrated than a diversity-trained ensemble, while leaving label accuracy and identifiable concepts untouched. Code is freely available at https://github.com/bio-ontology-research-group/hott-nesy.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

Redundancy rules for MaxSAT

The concept of redundancy in SAT leads to more expressive and powerful proof search techniques, e.g., able to express various inprocessing techniques, and originates interesting hierarchies of proof systems [Heule et$.$al'20, Buss-Thapen'19]. Redundancy has also been integrated in MaxSAT [Ihalainen et$.$al'22, Berg et$.$al'23, Bonacina et$.$al'24]. In this paper, we define a structured hierarchy of redundancy proof systems for MaxSAT, with the goal of studying its proof complexity. We obtain MaxSAT variants of proof systems such as SPR, PR, SR, and others, previously defined for SAT. All our rules are polynomially checkable, unlike [Ihalainen et$.$al'22]. Moreover, they are simpler and weaker than [Berg et$.$al'23], and possibly amenable to lower bounds. This work also complements the approach of [Bonacina et$.$al'24]. Their proof systems use different rule sets for soft and hard clauses, while here we propose a system using only hard clauses and blocking variables. This is easier to integrate with current solvers and proof checkers. We discuss the strength of the systems introduced, we show some limitations of them, and we give a short cost-SR proof that any assignment for the weak pigeonhole principle $PHP^{m}_{n}$ falsifies at least $m-n$ clauses. We conclude by discussing the integration of our rules with the MaxSAT resolution proof system, which is a commonly studied proof system for MaxSAT.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2026

Set-like operations on propositional logic programs

Composition and decomposition of logic programs have been studied extensively in the context of modularity, and decomposing a program along the dependency structure of its atoms --- by strata or strongly connected components in datalog, and by splitting sets in the non-monotonic setting of answer set programming --- is standard practice. All of these approaches operate on the level of rule sets: programs are cut along dependencies between atoms, while the internal structure of the individual rules remains untouched. In this paper, we complement this picture by a finer-grained algebra. We introduce set-like operations on (propositional Horn) logic programs --- body-union, body-intersection, body-complement, body-subtraction, body-symmetric-difference, and body-power-set --- which manipulate rule bodies in analogy to the corresponding set operations, and we study their algebraic laws and their interaction with sequential composition and the least model semantics. Our main technical result is a decomposition theorem in this algebra: every minimalist program --- containing at most one rule for each rule head --- is the body-union of Krom programs consisting only of rules with at most one body atom, in such a way that its least model is the intersection of the least models of these components; for arbitrary programs we obtain corresponding approximations. Since Krom programs are algebraically better behaved than arbitrary programs --- composition is associative and distributes from the left --- this may support decomposition-based reasoning and provides a basis for compositional program construction.

cs.LO↗