Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1106.2489

Eliciting Forecasts from Self-interested Experts: Scoring Rules for Decision Makers

Craig Boutilier
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Scoring rules for eliciting expert predictions of random variables are usually developed assuming that experts derive utility only from the quality of their predictions (e.g., score awarded by the rule, or payoff in a prediction market). We study a more realistic setting in which (a) the principal is a decision maker and will take a decision based on the expert's prediction; and (b) the expert has an inherent interest in the decision. For example, in a corporate decision market, the expert may derive different levels of utility from the actions taken by her manager. As a consequence the expert will usually have an incentive to misreport her forecast to influence the choice of the decision maker if typical scoring rules are used. We develop a general model for this setting and introduce the concept of a compensation rule. When combined with the expert's inherent utility for decisions, a compensation rule induces a net scoring rule that behaves like a normal scoring rule. Assuming full knowledge of expert utility, we provide a complete characterization of all (strictly) proper compensation rules. We then analyze the situation where the expert's utility function is not fully known to the decision maker. We show bounds on: (a) expert incentive to misreport; (b) the degree to which an expert will misreport; and (c) decision maker loss in utility due to such uncertainty. These bounds depend in natural ways on the degree of uncertainty, the local degree of convexity of net scoring function, and natural properties of the decision maker's utility function. They also suggest optimization procedures for the design of compensation rules. Finally, we briefly discuss the use of compensation rules as market scoring rules for self-interested experts in a prediction market.

Explore related subjects

cs.GTcs.AIcs.MAcs.SI

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Craig Boutilier. 2011-06-13. Eliciting Forecasts from Self-interested Experts: Scoring Rules for Decision Makers. https://arxiv.org/abs/1106.2489

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Robust Information Design with Heterogeneous Beliefs in Bayesian Congestion Games

In many engineered systems, agents make decisions under incomplete information, creating opportunities for a planner to influence decentralized behavior through signaling. We study how such signaling can be designed in parallel-network, affine latency congestion games when users may not interpret recommendations using the same beliefs assumed by the planner. To do so, we consider Bayesian congestion games with private recommendations and formulate a robust information design problem in which obedience must hold uniformly over a neighborhood of a nominal prior. This addresses the previously uncharacterized issue of whether obedience itself remains reliable under belief heterogeneity, rather than only under the single prior used at the design stage. We characterize policy-level robustness radii, identify regimes in which the robust obedience region remains nonempty, and analyze the resulting robustness--performance tradeoff through a robust value function whose optimal cost is monotone in the robustness requirement and whose local sensitivity is governed by the active obedience constraints.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

Core stability recognition for minimum-cost spanning tree games: Parameterized perspective

Minimum-cost spanning tree game (MSTG) is a cooperative game played on an undirected edge-weighted graph $(G,w)$ representing the network, where each vertex corresponds to a player and each edge has an associated cost~$w$. A distinguished vertex $s \in V(G)$ represents the supply or source. For any coalition of players $S$, the characteristic cost function $c(S)$ is defined as the minimum cost of a spanning tree with respect to $w$, connecting exactly the vertices in $S \cup \{s\}$. In this paper we study the computational complexity of deciding core membership for MSTG. In general, deciding whether a given allocation is in the core is \textsf{coNP}-hard~(Faigle et al.,International Journal of Game Theory,1997). We study the core recognition problem under the name {\sc MSTG Core Non-Membership}. We extend the hardness to graphs which are very close to being planar. On the positive side, we present several algorithmic results within the framework of parameterized complexity. We show that {\sc MSTG Core Non-Membership} is fixed-parameter tractable when parameterized by the support size of the allocation. Turning into structural parameters of graphs, we show that the problem admits an FPT algorithm parameterized by treewidth and signed neighborhood diversity. Last but not least, we investigate kernelization. While in general graphs, under standard complexity-theoretical assumptions, {\sc MSTG Core Non-Membership} does not admit a polynomial kernel parameterized by the vertex cover number, we design a cubic kernel in planar graphs. Furthermore, in general graphs, we obtain quadratic kernel for signed neighborhood diversity and linear kernel for the parameter feedback edge number.

cs.GT↗
arXiv2026

Condorcet-type properties of the linear ordering problem with ties

The Kemeny rule aggregates multiple strict rankings into a single strict ranking that minimizes the sum of its distances from the input rankings. The resulting optimization problem, called the Kemeny problem (\texttt{KP}), is a special case of the linear ordering problem (\texttt{LOP}). The Kemeny rule satisfies several desirable properties in social choice theory, including the extended Condorcet criterion (\texttt{XCC}). Ando et al. strengthened this result by introducing the strong Condorcet criterion (\texttt{SCC}) and showing that it holds for every optimal solution to an arbitrary \texttt{LOP} instance. Yoo and Escobedo extended the Kemeny rule to rankings with ties and showed that the resulting rule satisfies the non-strict extended Condorcet criterion (\texttt{NXCC}). This criterion gives a condition under which one candidate must be ranked strictly above another in every optimal solution. In this paper, we introduce the non-strict strong Condorcet criterion (\texttt{NSCC}), a counterpart of the \texttt{SCC} for rankings with ties, and show that it holds for every optimal solution to an arbitrary instance of the linear ordering problem with ties (\texttt{LOPT}). We also establish a complementary structural property that gives conditions under which two candidates must be tied in every optimal solution to an arbitrary \texttt{LOPT} instance.

cs.GT↗