Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2303.11046

Convergence analysis and acceleration of the smoothing methods for solving extensive-form games

Abstract

The extensive-form game has been studied considerably in recent years. It can represent games with multiple decision points and incomplete information, and hence it is helpful in formulating games with uncertain inputs, such as poker. We consider an extended-form game with two players and zero-sum, i.e., the sum of their payoffs is always zero. In such games, the problem of finding the optimal strategy can be formulated as a bilinear saddle-point problem. This formulation grows huge depending on the size of the game, since it has variables representing the strategies at all decision points for each player. To solve such large-scale bilinear saddle-point problems, the excessive gap technique (EGT), a smoothing method, has been studied. This method generates a sequence of approximate solutions whose error is guaranteed to converge at $\mathcal{O}(1/k)$, where $k$ is the number of iterations. However, it has the disadvantage of having poor theoretical bounds on the error related to the game size. This makes it inapplicable to large games. Our goal is to improve the smoothing method for solving extensive-form games so that it can be applied to large-scale games. To this end, we make two contributions in this work. First, we slightly modify the strongly convex function used in the smoothing method in order to improve the theoretical bounds related to the game size. Second, we propose a heuristic called centering trick, which allows the smoothing method to be combined with other methods and consequently accelerates the convergence in practice. As a result, we combine EGT with CFR+, a state-of-the-art method for extensive-form games, to achieve good performance in games where conventional smoothing methods do not perform well. The proposed smoothing method is shown to have the potential to solve large games in practice.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Keigo Habara, Ellen Hidemi Fukuda, Nobuo Yamashita. 2023-03-20. Convergence analysis and acceleration of the smoothing methods for solving extensive-form games. https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.11046

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

MMS Allocation for Chores with Online Agent Arrivals

We study the fair allocation of $m$ indivisible chores to $n$ agents with subadditive cost functions arriving online in an arbitrary order. Upon an agent's arrival, we are informed of her cost function and must irrevocably assign her a set of chores. We focus on the Maximin Share (MMS) fairness notion and aim to compute an allocation in which all items are assigned, and no agent incurs a cost more than $\alpha$ times her MMS. Without any prior information about the instance (other than $n$ and $m$), we design an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{n, k\log^{1+\epsilon}k, \log m\})$ for any constant $\epsilon > 0$, where $k$ denotes the number of cost function types. Our bound matches the best known offline approximation guarantees for MMS under subadditive costs and is nearly optimal with respect to all three parameters: we show that even for binary additive cost functions, no online algorithm can achieve a competitive ratio of $o(\min\{n, k\log k, \log m\})$. We then consider the setting in which the $k$ cost function types are known in advance (though the realized types of arriving agents are not). For additive cost functions, we provide an algorithm with a competitive ratio of $O(\min\{\log k, \log(kn)/\log\log(kn)\})$, and show that constant-competitive algorithms do not exist for general $k$, even for the binary additive setting. For binary additive functions when $k \le n$, we propose a $3$-competitive algorithm and establish a lower bound of $2$.

cs.GT

Truncated Noisy Best-Response Algorithms: Toward Game Theoretic Learning with Safety Guarantees

We consider a game theoretic approach to solve multi-agent coordination problems with submodular maximization objectives. It is known for such problems that the Nash equilibria for the corresponding game are always within 50% of the optimal, but that the equilibria which achieve this worst-case bound are not stable. To exploit this instability, we propose a family of algorithms which we call Truncated Noisy Best-Response (TNBR) Algorithms. These algorithms are flexibly characterized by agents asynchronously and stochastically selecting actions from a neighbourhood of their best response payoffs. We compute bounds on the recurrent classes of TNBR algorithms' associated Markov chains. Our bounds fall into two categories: first, "Performance" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms always have a high-value recurrent state; second, "Safety" bounds ensure that TNBR algorithms never have arbitrarily-bad recurrent states. Furthermore, these two types of bounds are linked by a waterbed-like effect: every game with a poor Safety guarantee necessarily has a favorable Performance guarantee.

cs.GT

Existence of the Core in Approval-Based Committee Elections

We settle the main open question in the theory of approval-based multi-winner elections: we show that there always exists a committee in the core. The core is a stability and group fairness concept. The proof introduces a new voting rule that optimizes an entropy-like objective function over committees and payment systems. All local optima of this objective function lie in the core, which implies that a core committee can be found in polynomial time.

cs.GT