Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2407.02183

How do financial variables impact public debt growth in China? An empirical study based on Markov regime-switching model

Abstract

The deep financial turmoil in China caused by the COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated fiscal shocks and soaring public debt levels, which raises concerns about the stability and sustainability of China's public debt growth in the future. This paper employs the Markov regime-switching model with time-varying transition probability (TVTP-MS) to investigate the growth pattern of China's public debt and the impact of financial variables such as credit, house prices and stock prices on the growth of public debt. We identify two distinct regimes of China's public debt, i.e., the surge regime with high growth rate and high volatility and the steady regime with low growth rate and low volatility. The main results are twofold. On the one hand, an increase in the growth rate of the financial variables helps to moderate the growth rate of public debt, whereas the effects differ between the two regimes. More specifically, the impacts of credit and house prices are significant in the surge regime, whereas stock prices affect public debt growth significantly in the steady regime. On the other hand, a higher growth rate of financial variables also increases the probability of public debt either staying in or switching to the steady regime. These findings highlight the necessity of aligning financial adjustments with the prevailing public debt regime when developing sustainable fiscal policies.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Tianbao Zhou, Zhixin Liu, Yingying Xu. 2024-07-02. How do financial variables impact public debt growth in China? An empirical study based on Markov regime-switching model. https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.02183

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Poverty Targeting with Imperfect Information

How should antipoverty programs allocate transfers when household income is known only through noisy predictions? I formulate this as a statistical decision problem in which a policymaker chooses nonnegative transfers within a fixed budget to minimize squared deviations of post-transfer income from the poverty line. I show that the standard plug-in rule, which treats predictions as exact, is inadmissible. I then develop a nonparametric empirical Bayes allocation rule that replaces the estimated gaps with posterior mean poverty gaps. Its Bayes regret is bounded by the mean squared difference between its posterior mean gaps and the oracle's, so the budget and nonnegativity constraints do not slow its convergence to the oracle. The approach extends, with weaker guarantees, to a planner who cares only about how far households remain below the poverty line after transfers and to programs that pay a fixed set of benefit amounts. In simulations using household surveys from nine African countries, the allocations under the empirical Bayes rule reach about 1.8 times as many poor people as those under plug-in OLS with the same budget and achieve the same average poverty gap reduction with 6.7% less spending.

econ.EM

Estimating Treatment Effects in Panel Data Without Parallel Trends

This paper proposes a novel approach for estimating treatment effects in panel data settings, addressing key limitations of the standard difference-in-differences (DID) approach. The standard approach relies on the parallel trends assumption, implicitly requiring that unobservable factors correlated with treatment assignment be unidimensional, time-invariant, and affect untreated potential outcomes in an additively separable manner. This paper introduces a more flexible framework that allows for multidimensional unobservables and non-additive separability, and provides sufficient conditions for identifying the average treatment effect on the treated. An empirical application to job displacement reveals substantially smaller long-run earnings losses compared to the standard DID approach, demonstrating the framework's ability to account for unobserved heterogeneity that manifests as differential outcome trajectories between treated and control groups.

econ.EM

Single-Network Finite-Sample Inference in Strategic Network Formation Models

We develop a finite-sample valid inference procedure for strategic network formation models with endogenous network statistics, using only a single observed network. We impose no restrictions on network density, equilibrium selection, or the dependence structure induced by strategic interaction. Using a "bounding-by-c" technique, we obtain realization-wise sandwich inequalities whose middle term depends only on exogenous covariates and i.i.d. pairwise shocks. These inequalities deliver pathwise identifying restrictions and simulable finite-sample critical values in both parametric and semiparametric settings. Our proposed procedure is also computationally tractable: it does not involve solving, simulating, or enumerating equilibrium (sub)networks, and easily scales to networks with 10000 agents in simulations. In two empirical applications, we find statistical evidence for positive link interdependence at the 95% confidence level.

econ.EM