Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2506.02875

NTIRE 2025 XGC Quality Assessment Challenge: Methods and Results

Xiaohong Liu·Xiongkuo Min·Qiang Hu·Xiaoyun Zhang·Jie Guo·Guangtao Zhai·Shushi Wang·Yingjie Zhou·Lu Liu·Jingxin Li·Liu Yang·Farong Wen·Li Xu·Yanwei Jiang·Xilei Zhu·Chunyi Li·Zicheng Zhang·Huiyu Duan·Xiele Wu·Yixuan Gao·Yuqin Cao·Jun Jia·Wei Sun·Jiezhang Cao·Radu Timofte·Baojun Li·Jiamian Huang·Dan Luo·Tao Liu·Weixia Zhang·Bingkun Zheng·Junlin Chen·Ruikai Zhou·Meiya Chen·Yu Wang·Hao Jiang·Xiantao Li·Yuxiang Jiang·Jun Tang·Yimeng Zhao·Bo Hu·Zelu Qi·Chaoyang Zhang·Fei Zhao·Ping Shi·Lingzhi Fu·Heng Cong·Shuai He·Rongyu Zhang·Jiarong He·Zongyao Hu·Wei Luo·Zihao Yu·Fengbin Guan·Yiting Lu·Xin Li·Zhibo Chen·Mengjing Su·Yi Wang·Tuo Chen·Chunxiao Li·Shuaiyu Zhao·Jiaxin Wen·Chuyi Lin·Sitong Liu·Ningxin Chu·Jing Wan·Yu Zhou·Baoying Chen·Jishen Zeng·Jiarui Liu·Xianjin Liu·Xin Chen·Lanzhi Zhou·Hangyu Li·You Han·Bibo Xiang·Zhenjie Liu·Jianzhang Lu·Jialin Gui·Renjie Lu·Shangfei Wang·Donghao Zhou·Jingyu Lin·Quanjian Song·Jiancheng Huang·Yufeng Yang·Changwei Wang·Shupeng Zhong·Yang Yang·Lihuo He·Jia Liu·Yuting Xing·Tida Fang·Yuchun Jin
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

This paper reports on the NTIRE 2025 XGC Quality Assessment Challenge, which will be held in conjunction with the New Trends in Image Restoration and Enhancement Workshop (NTIRE) at CVPR 2025. This challenge is to address a major challenge in the field of video and talking head processing. The challenge is divided into three tracks, including user generated video, AI generated video and talking head. The user-generated video track uses the FineVD-GC, which contains 6,284 user generated videos. The user-generated video track has a total of 125 registered participants. A total of 242 submissions are received in the development phase, and 136 submissions are received in the test phase. Finally, 5 participating teams submitted their models and fact sheets. The AI generated video track uses the Q-Eval-Video, which contains 34,029 AI-Generated Videos (AIGVs) generated by 11 popular Text-to-Video (T2V) models. A total of 133 participants have registered in this track. A total of 396 submissions are received in the development phase, and 226 submissions are received in the test phase. Finally, 6 participating teams submitted their models and fact sheets. The talking head track uses the THQA-NTIRE, which contains 12,247 2D and 3D talking heads. A total of 89 participants have registered in this track. A total of 225 submissions are received in the development phase, and 118 submissions are received in the test phase. Finally, 8 participating teams submitted their models and fact sheets. Each participating team in every track has proposed a method that outperforms the baseline, which has contributed to the development of fields in three tracks.

Explore related subjects

cs.CV

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Xiaohong Liu, Xiongkuo Min, Qiang Hu, Xiaoyun Zhang, Jie Guo, Guangtao Zhai, Shushi Wang, Yingjie Zhou, Lu Liu, Jingxin Li, Liu Yang, Farong Wen, Li Xu, Yanwei Jiang, Xilei Zhu, Chunyi Li, Zicheng Zhang, Huiyu Duan, Xiele Wu, Yixuan Gao, Yuqin Cao, Jun Jia, Wei Sun, Jiezhang Cao, Radu Timofte, Baojun Li, Jiamian Huang, Dan Luo, Tao Liu, Weixia Zhang, Bingkun Zheng, Junlin Chen, Ruikai Zhou, Meiya Chen, Yu Wang, Hao Jiang, Xiantao Li, Yuxiang Jiang, Jun Tang, Yimeng Zhao, Bo Hu, Zelu Qi, Chaoyang Zhang, Fei Zhao, Ping Shi, Lingzhi Fu, Heng Cong, Shuai He, Rongyu Zhang, Jiarong He, Zongyao Hu, Wei Luo, Zihao Yu, Fengbin Guan, Yiting Lu, Xin Li, Zhibo Chen, Mengjing Su, Yi Wang, Tuo Chen, Chunxiao Li, Shuaiyu Zhao, Jiaxin Wen, Chuyi Lin, Sitong Liu, Ningxin Chu, Jing Wan, Yu Zhou, Baoying Chen, Jishen Zeng, Jiarui Liu, Xianjin Liu, Xin Chen, Lanzhi Zhou, Hangyu Li, You Han, Bibo Xiang, Zhenjie Liu, Jianzhang Lu, Jialin Gui, Renjie Lu, Shangfei Wang, Donghao Zhou, Jingyu Lin, Quanjian Song, Jiancheng Huang, Yufeng Yang, Changwei Wang, Shupeng Zhong, Yang Yang, Lihuo He, Jia Liu, Yuting Xing, Tida Fang, Yuchun Jin. 2025-06-03. NTIRE 2025 XGC Quality Assessment Challenge: Methods and Results. https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.02875

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Privacy Leakage on DNNs: A Survey of Model Inversion Attacks and Defenses

Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) have revolutionized various domains with their exceptional performance across numerous applications. However, Model Inversion (MI) attacks, which disclose private information about the training dataset by abusing access to the trained models, have emerged as a formidable privacy threat. Given a trained network, these attacks enable adversaries to reconstruct high-fidelity data that closely aligns with the private training samples, posing significant privacy concerns. Despite the rapid advances in the field, we lack a comprehensive and systematic overview of existing MI attacks and defenses. To fill this gap, this paper thoroughly investigates this realm and presents a holistic survey. Firstly, our work briefly reviews early MI studies on traditional machine learning scenarios. We then elaborately analyze and compare numerous recent attacks and defenses on Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) across multiple modalities and learning tasks. By meticulously analyzing their distinctive features, we summarize and classify these methods into different categories and provide a novel taxonomy. Finally, this paper discusses promising research directions and presents potential solutions to open issues. To facilitate further study on MI attacks and defenses, we have implemented an open-source model inversion toolbox on GitHub (https://github.com/ffhibnese/Model-Inversion-Attack-ToolBox).

cs.CV↗
arXiv2026

ALINA: Advanced Line Identification and Notation Algorithm

Labels are the cornerstone of supervised machine learning algorithms. Most visual recognition methods are fully supervised, using bounding boxes or pixel-wise segmentations for object localization. Traditional labeling methods, such as crowd-sourcing, are prohibitive due to cost, data privacy, amount of time, and potential errors on large datasets. To address these issues, we propose a novel annotation framework, Advanced Line Identification and Notation Algorithm (ALINA), which can be used for labeling taxiway datasets that consist of different camera perspectives and variable weather attributes (sunny and cloudy). Additionally, the CIRCular threshoLd pixEl Discovery And Traversal (CIRCLEDAT) algorithm has been proposed, which is an integral step in determining the pixels corresponding to taxiway line markings. Once the pixels are identified, ALINA generates corresponding pixel coordinate annotations on the frame. Using this approach, 60,249 frames from the taxiway dataset, AssistTaxi have been labeled. To evaluate the performance, a context-based edge map (CBEM) set was generated manually based on edge features and connectivity. The detection rate after testing the annotated labels with the CBEM set was recorded as 98.45%, attesting its dependability and effectiveness.

cs.CV↗
arXiv2026

DisasterInsight: A Building-Centric Benchmark for Evaluating Vision--Language Models in Disaster Response

Vision--language models (VLMs) show promise for disaster-response remote sensing, but existing benchmarks mainly emphasize scene-level or damage-centric assessment. To study this building-centric gap, we introduce \method{}, a diagnostic benchmark built on xBD, a pre/post-disaster satellite dataset with building-level damage labels. \method{} enriches building instances with OpenStreetMap-derived functional labels and contains 134{,}108 task-specific instruction records across 15 task types, spanning instance-level assessment, scene-level counting, multi-instance reasoning, and structured report generation. The benchmark supports RGB pre/post-disaster imagery, single- and multi-view instance formulations, and scene-level RGB/SAR diagnostic inputs. Experiments with general-domain and remote-sensing VLMs show that models perform better on visible damage cues than on building-function understanding, multi-instance reasoning, counting, and grounded reporting. Instruction tuning improves performance on several tasks but does not close this building-centric gap.

cs.CV↗