Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2506.07766

Enterprise value, economic and policy uncertainties: the case of US air carriers

Abstract

The enterprise value (EV) is a crucial metric in company valuation as it encompasses not only equity but also assets and liabilities, offering a comprehensive measure of total value, especially for companies with diverse capital structures. The relationship between economic uncertainty and firm value is rooted in economic theory, with early studies dating back to Sandmo's work in 1971 and further elaborated upon by John Kenneth Galbraith in 1977. Subsequent significant events have underscored the pivotal role of uncertainty in the financial and economic realm. Using a VAR-MIDAS methodology, analysis of accumulated impulse responses reveals that the EV of air carrier firms responds heterogeneously to financial and economic uncertainties, suggesting unique coping strategies. Most firms exhibit negative reactions to recessionary risks and economic policy uncertainties. Financial shocks also elicit varied responses, with positive impacts observed on EV in response to increases in the current ratio and operating income after depreciation. However, high debt levels are unfavorably received by the market, leading to negative EV responses to debt-to-asset ratio shocks. Other financial shocks show mixed or indeterminate impacts on EV.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Bahram Adrangi, Arjun Chatrath, Madhuparna Kolay, Kambiz Raffiee. 2025-06-09. Enterprise value, economic and policy uncertainties: the case of US air carriers. https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.07766

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Poverty Targeting with Imperfect Information

How should antipoverty programs allocate transfers when household income is known only through noisy predictions? I formulate this as a statistical decision problem in which a policymaker chooses nonnegative transfers within a fixed budget to minimize squared deviations of post-transfer income from the poverty line. I show that the standard plug-in rule, which treats predictions as exact, is inadmissible. I then develop a nonparametric empirical Bayes allocation rule that replaces the estimated gaps with posterior mean poverty gaps. Its Bayes regret is bounded by the mean squared difference between its posterior mean gaps and the oracle's, so the budget and nonnegativity constraints do not slow its convergence to the oracle. The approach extends, with weaker guarantees, to a planner who cares only about how far households remain below the poverty line after transfers and to programs that pay a fixed set of benefit amounts. In simulations using household surveys from nine African countries, the allocations under the empirical Bayes rule reach about 1.8 times as many poor people as those under plug-in OLS with the same budget and achieve the same average poverty gap reduction with 6.7% less spending.

econ.EM

Estimating Treatment Effects in Panel Data Without Parallel Trends

This paper proposes a novel approach for estimating treatment effects in panel data settings, addressing key limitations of the standard difference-in-differences (DID) approach. The standard approach relies on the parallel trends assumption, implicitly requiring that unobservable factors correlated with treatment assignment be unidimensional, time-invariant, and affect untreated potential outcomes in an additively separable manner. This paper introduces a more flexible framework that allows for multidimensional unobservables and non-additive separability, and provides sufficient conditions for identifying the average treatment effect on the treated. An empirical application to job displacement reveals substantially smaller long-run earnings losses compared to the standard DID approach, demonstrating the framework's ability to account for unobserved heterogeneity that manifests as differential outcome trajectories between treated and control groups.

econ.EM

Single-Network Finite-Sample Inference in Strategic Network Formation Models

We develop a finite-sample valid inference procedure for strategic network formation models with endogenous network statistics, using only a single observed network. We impose no restrictions on network density, equilibrium selection, or the dependence structure induced by strategic interaction. Using a "bounding-by-c" technique, we obtain realization-wise sandwich inequalities whose middle term depends only on exogenous covariates and i.i.d. pairwise shocks. These inequalities deliver pathwise identifying restrictions and simulable finite-sample critical values in both parametric and semiparametric settings. Our proposed procedure is also computationally tractable: it does not involve solving, simulating, or enumerating equilibrium (sub)networks, and easily scales to networks with 10000 agents in simulations. In two empirical applications, we find statistical evidence for positive link interdependence at the 95% confidence level.

econ.EM