Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2512.00113

From RISC-V Cores to Neuromorphic Arrays: A Tutorial on Building Scalable Digital Neuromorphic Processors

Amirreza Yousefzadeh
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Digital neuromorphic processors are emerging as a promising computing substrate for low-power, always-on EdgeAI applications. In this tutorial paper, we outline the main architectural design principles behind fully digital neuromorphic processors and illustrate them using the SENECA platform as a running example. Starting from a flexible array of tiny RISC-V processing cores connected by a simple Network-on-Chip (NoC), we show how to progressively evolve the architecture: from a baseline event-driven implementation of fully connected networks, to versions with dedicated Neural Processing Elements (NPEs) and a loop controller that offloads fine-grained control from the general-purpose cores. Along the way, we discuss software and mapping techniques such as spike grouping, event-driven depth-first convolution for convolutional networks, and hard-attention style processing for high-resolution event-based vision. The focus is on architectural trade-offs, performance and energy bottlenecks, and on leveraging flexibility to incrementally add domain-specific acceleration. This paper assumes familiarity with basic neuromorphic concepts (spikes, event-driven computation, sparse activation) and deep neural network workloads. It does not present new experimental results; instead, it synthesizes and contextualizes findings previously reported in our SENECA publications to provide a coherent, step-by-step architectural perspective for students and practitioners who wish to design their own digital neuromorphic processors.

Explore related subjects

cs.ARcs.AIeess.SP

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Amirreza Yousefzadeh. 2025-11-27. From RISC-V Cores to Neuromorphic Arrays: A Tutorial on Building Scalable Digital Neuromorphic Processors. https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.00113

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

A System Architecture for Low Latency Multiprogramming Quantum Computing

As quantum systems scale, multiprogramming quantum computing (MPQC) provides a practical way to improve device utilization and throughput. However, because quantum executables are device-dependent, non-portable across qubit regions, and highly susceptible to noise and crosstalk, current MPQC pipelines rely on expensive online compilation to co-optimize concurrently running programs. This online step dominates runtime and impedes low-latency deployments for practical, real-world workloads in the future, such as repeatedly invoked quantum neural network (QNN) services. We present FLAMENCO, a fidelity-aware multi-version compilation system that enables independent offline compilation and low-latency multiprogramming at runtime. \textbf{At the architecture level}, the system abstracts devices into compute units to reduce the search space of region allocation. \textbf{At compile time}, it generates diverse executable versions for each program---each bound to a distinct qubit region---allowing dynamic region selection at runtime and overcoming non-portability. \textbf{At runtime}, it employs a lightweight orchestrator that uses post-compilation fidelity metrics to avoid conflicts and mitigate crosstalk, supporting conflict-free co-execution without online co-optimization. Evaluations show that FLAMENCO achieves over 5$\times$ runtime speedup in post-scheduling execution while maintaining comparable execution fidelity on common-success workloads. When integrated into existing scheduler-coupled systems, it raises workload-level conflict-free orchestration ratio from 0.183 to 1.000 for HyperQ and from 0.050 to 0.400 for QOS.

cs.AR↗
arXiv2026

Microflow: Microarchitectural Causal Observability for Deep Cross-Layer Analysis and Optimization

Modern computer architecture relies heavily on simulation to identify bottlenecks and evaluate optimizations. However, existing microarchitectural performance analysis methods are fundamentally limited by an instruction-centric paradigm that captures only downstream symptoms while leaving the true microarchitectural root cause opaque. Because modern processors are governed by complex interactions across non-instruction entities like prefetchers, replacement policies, and shared queue occupancies, instruction-centric frameworks miss the mechanisms that dictate performance. To eliminate this blind spot, we present Microflow, a framework that achieves causal observability in microarchitectural simulation. To address this, we introduce the Microflow intermediate representation (MFIR), which models execution through microarchitecture-tailored core abstractions such as flows, resource tenancies, and causal edges. By compiling simulation runs into a relational causal database, Microflow decouples tracing from analytical processing. This transforms complex diagnostics into expressive queries, enabling architects to trace performance symptoms directly to hardware root causes without developing bespoke analysis scripts or running costly re-simulations for every new question. We demonstrate that Microflow solves pathologies opaque to conventional tools. Across CVP-1 benchmarks, Microflow decomposes a 22% prefetcher oracle headroom by attributing 61.4% of stall mass to specific hardware prefetcher decisions, yielding a 2.31% average speedup (peaking at 25.11%). Furthermore, it exposes the hidden pipeline-blocking residue of wrong-path execution with high portability and precision across simulators.

cs.AR↗
arXiv2026

On the Limits of Machine-Learned Ranking for Modern Microarchitectural Policies

Machine-learning predictors estimate processor performance far faster than cycle-level simulation. For design-space exploration, however, the valuable test is not merely reproducing the usual hardware ordering, but identifying how different hardware configurations rank on individual program phases. We evaluate four ML-predictors in two design regimes: \emph{Structural Parameters} (SP), varying hardware resources such as issue width, ROB size, and cache capacity; and \emph{Behavioral Policies} (BP), varying prefetching and replacement algorithms. In the SP regime, aggregate ranking is strong, yet counter-intuitive windows(CIW)---where the configuration expected to be slower is faster---constitute $22.4\%$ of non-tied windows across five pairs with a clear architectural prior. CIW match across these pairs is only $23.3$--$39.9\%$; every point estimate is below the $50\%$ random strict-ordering reference. The BP regime presents a different failure: ground-truth ties cover $37.8\%$ of pair-windows, most strict pairs have margins of only a few cycles, and no model family reliably beats a feature-free majority baseline. NeuroScalar and SimNet fall below that baseline, Concorde is statistically tied with it, and the best selected OneDSE head improves by only $2.1$ percentage points. Accuracy rises mainly at large margins. We further show that this failure is not a matter of model capacity: an information-theoretic analysis reveals that when ranking outcomes depend on hidden microarchitectural state absent from the instruction stream, no trace-based predictor can exceed the Bayes accuracy determined by observable inputs alone. Thus high cycle or aggregate ranking accuracy can reflect mastery of easy, high-margin cases while missing the local reversals that carry the most architectural insight and for which cycle-level simulation remains indispensable.

cs.AR↗