Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2609.00207

Rock, Paper, Scissors, ... Dynamite - A Model of Disruption from New Technologies

Andrew J. Lohn
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We seek to understand the effect of adding disruptive highly-capable new technologies to competitions by assessing the addition of Dynamite to Rock-Paper-Scissors. We find that providing a versatile Dynamite move to only one player provides limited value (win probability increases from 50% to 55.5%) and is played rarely. That value decreases further if the game is expanded beyond just the original three moves. We also observe several mechanisms by which prior moves can become strategically unplayable, or obsolete. We hope that this model illustrates some non-intuitive aspects of developing new versatile technologies. We also hope that it illustrates some pitfalls for developers and integrators to avoid in order to create value rather than merely capability.

Explore related subjects

physics.soc-phcs.AIcs.ETcs.GT

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Andrew J. Lohn. 2026-08-31. Rock, Paper, Scissors, ... Dynamite - A Model of Disruption from New Technologies. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.00207

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

cs.AI subjectcs.ET subjectcs.GT subjectphysics.soc-ph subject

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Toward a social psychology of AI: language-model agents reproduce human-like minimal-group bias

Language-model agents now interact in groups, but evaluations that probe memorised stereotype content or use models to simulate people leave this social behaviour unmeasured. We adapt the minimal-group paradigm---social psychology's classic test of intergroup bias---into a controlled probe: an agent distributes points among anonymous peers bearing only an arbitrary group label. Across four reasoning models, mere categorisation into meaningless groups elicited in-group favouritism that vanished under a group-blind control and was concentrated in the numerical minority: minority deciders over-allocated to their own group relative to their numbers, majority deciders allocated close to proportionally, and the asymmetry closed at equal group sizes. Disabling reasoning in one model did not remove the disposition---if anything it grew---but nearly erased the minority-majority asymmetry, implicating deliberation in where bias concentrates rather than whether it appears. These open-weight reasoning models reproduce the behavioural signature of human intergroup discrimination, independent of stereotype content, and social psychology's theories and methods offer a paradigm for measuring and governing AI's social behaviour.

physics.soc-ph↗
arXiv2019

Small worlds and clustering in spatial networks

Networks with underlying metric spaces attract increasing research attention in network science, statistical physics, applied mathematics, computer science, sociology, and other fields. This attention is further amplified by the current surge of activity in graph embedding. In the vast realm of spatial network models, only a few reproduce even the most basic properties of real-world networks. Here, we focus on three such properties--sparsity, small worldness, and clustering--and identify the general subclass of spatial homogeneous and heterogeneous network models that are sparse small worlds and that have nonzero clustering in the thermodynamic limit. We rely on the maximum entropy approach where network links correspond to noninteracting fermions whose energy dependence on spatial distances determines network small worldness and clustering.

physics.soc-ph↗
arXiv2026

Integrating adaptive human behavior into epidemic models with large language models

Infectious disease transmission is shaped by patterns of human interaction, which adapt as epidemic conditions change. Capturing these context-dependent behaviors remains a fundamental challenge for epidemic models. Here, we recast this challenge by using large language models (LLMs) to represent adaptive human behavior within mechanistic epidemic models. We operationalize this idea through Generative Adaptive Behavioral Layer for Epidemics (GABLE), which adapts LLMs to infer behavioral responses to epidemic and policy conditions and translates them into age-structured contact matrices coupled to a mechanistic epidemic model. Applied to COVID-19 in France, GABLE reproduced responses in population mixing and age-specific contact structures that remained epidemiologically informative. In short-term forecasting, LLM-generated contact matrices outperformed mobility-driven matrices derived from real-world mobility data, with the largest gains at longer horizons. GABLE also extends beyond forecasting to prospective policy evaluation by projecting behavioral and epidemic responses to candidate interventions before implementation. When supplied with subsequently implemented policies, GABLE reproduced epidemic trajectories and generated distinct responses to alternative policy timing and composition. By leveraging LLMs as a flexible behavioral layer, GABLE provides a framework for coupling context-sensitive behavioral generation with epidemic dynamics.

physics.soc-ph↗