Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2609.13565

Scaling Chance-Constrained Correlated Equilibrium Computation for Exclusive Resource-Assignment Games

Abstract

The chance-constrained correlated equilibrium concept provides a robust coordination technique for self-interested agents whose costs are uncertain to a central coordinator, but the number of joint actions considered in its computation grows exponentially with the number of agents. We propose an exact-one resource-assignment restriction for games in which agents compete for shared resources and simultaneous use of a resource is undesirable or unsafe. The restriction allows each resource to be assigned to exactly one agent, reducing the number of joint actions considered from O(2^(nr)) to O(n^r) for n agents and r resources. The resulting problem is solved over the restricted joint action set while retaining all incentive constraints associated with unilateral deviations. We show that the feasible set of the restricted problem is exactly the convex hull of the chance-constrained pure Nash equilibria contained in the exact-one assignment set, yielding a necessary and sufficient condition for nonemptiness. We further derive a sufficient condition under which all chance-constrained pure Nash equilibria of the unrestricted game are retained by the restriction. Numerical experiments in a vertiport departure-corridor coordination scenario demonstrate a 99.81% reduction in median computation time relative to the unrestricted formulation while achieving equivalent coordination performance.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jaehan Im, Ufuk Topcu, David Fridovich-Keil. 2026-09-11. Scaling Chance-Constrained Correlated Equilibrium Computation for Exclusive Resource-Assignment Games. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.13565

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Learning in Structured Stackelberg Games

We initiate the study of structured Stackelberg games, a novel form of strategic interaction between a leader and a follower where contextual information can be predictive of the follower's (unknown) type. Motivated by applications such as security games and AI safety, we show how this additional structure can help the leader learn a utility-maximizing policy in both the online and distributional settings. In the online setting, we first prove that standard learning-theoretic measures of complexity do not characterize the difficulty of the leader's learning task. Notably, we find that there exists a learning-theoretic measure of complexity, analogous to the Littlestone dimension in online classification, that tightly characterizes the leader's instance-optimal regret. We term this the Stackelberg-Littlestone dimension, and leverage it to provide a provably optimal online learning algorithm. In the distributional setting, we provide analogous results by showing that two new dimensions control the sample complexity upper- and lower-bound.

cs.GT

Equilibrium and Infeasibility: A new solution concept for games

Addressing infeasibility in non-cooperative games has become an important topic, as many problems across different applications face this issue. In this paper, we propose a new solution concept for generalized games with possibly infeasible individual constraints. A solution is defined as the limit of a sequence of generalized Nash equilibria induced by games with penalty terms relaxing the individual constraints. Existence is established for a broad range of games and we provide conditions allowing to characterize a $ψ$-penalized solution as a strategy profile maximizing every player's utility over all her penalty minimizing strategies. A variation of Divide-the-Dollar serves as an illustrative example. We further establish the compatibility with the GNE and the solution to the Nash bargaining.

cs.GT

Subgame-Perfect Nash Equilibria of Plurality Voting with Abstention: a PSPACE-Completeness Result for Restricted Ballots

We consider sequential Plurality elections in which each voter may abstain or vote for a single candidate. Each voter assigns utilities to all candidates; for each voter, this induces a (weak) order over the candidates. Ties are resolved uniformly at random, and voting has a small positive cost, so that a voter prefers to abstain when their vote cannot change the election outcome. We consider a variant of this model where, for each voter, we additionally specify a prefix of her ranking, so that she is only allowed to vote for a candidate from that prefix (or abstain). We prove that for this variant of the model, deciding whether a designated candidate is among the election winners in a subgame-perfect equilibrium of the associated extensive-form game is PSPACE-complete. This partially resolves an open problem from the work of Desmedt and Elkind [2010].

cs.GT