Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 1902.01055

Probing the Fundamental Nature of Dark Matter with the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope

Alex Drlica-Wagner·Yao-Yuan Mao·Susmita Adhikari·Robert Armstrong·Arka Banerjee·Nilanjan Banik·Keith Bechtol·Simeon Bird·Kimberly K. Boddy·Ana Bonaca·Jo Bovy·Matthew R. Buckley·Esra Bulbul·Chihway Chang·George Chapline·Johann Cohen-Tanugi·Alessandro Cuoco·Francis-Yan Cyr-Racine·William A. Dawson·Ana Díaz Rivero·Cora Dvorkin·Denis Erkal·Christopher D. Fassnacht·Juan García-Bellido·Maurizio Giannotti·Vera Gluscevic·Nathan Golovich·David Hendel·Yashar D. Hezaveh·Shunsaku Horiuchi·M. James Jee·Manoj Kaplinghat·Charles R. Keeton·Sergey E. Koposov·Casey Y. Lam·Ting S. Li·Jessica R. Lu·Rachel Mandelbaum·Samuel D. McDermott·Mitch McNanna·Michael Medford·Manuel Meyer·Moniez Marc·Simona Murgia·Ethan O. Nadler·Lina Necib·Eric Nuss·Andrew B. Pace·Annika H. G. Peter·Daniel A. Polin·Chanda Prescod-Weinstein·Justin I. Read·Rogerio Rosenfeld·Nora Shipp·Joshua D. Simon·Tracy R. Slatyer·Oscar Straniero·Louis E. Strigari·Erik Tollerud·J. Anthony Tyson·Mei-Yu Wang·Risa H. Wechsler·David Wittman·Hai-Bo Yu·Gabrijela Zaharijas·Yacine Ali-Haïmoud·James Annis·Simon Birrer·Rahul Biswas·Jonathan Blazek·Alyson M. Brooks·Elizabeth Buckley-Geer·Regina Caputo·Eric Charles·Seth Digel·Scott Dodelson·Brenna Flaugher·Joshua Frieman·Eric Gawiser·Andrew P. Hearin·Renee Hložek·Bhuvnesh Jain·Tesla E. Jeltema·Savvas M. Koushiappas·Mariangela Lisanti·Marilena LoVerde·Siddharth Mishra-Sharma·Jeffrey A. Newman·Brian Nord·Erfan Nourbakhsh·Steven Ritz·Brant E. Robertson·Miguel A. Sánchez-Conde·Anže Slosar·Tim M. P. Tait·Aprajita Verma·Ricardo Vilalta·Christopher W. Walter·Brian Yanny·Andrew R. Zentner
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Astrophysical and cosmological observations currently provide the only robust, empirical measurements of dark matter. Future observations with Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST) will provide necessary guidance for the experimental dark matter program. This white paper represents a community effort to summarize the science case for studying the fundamental physics of dark matter with LSST. We discuss how LSST will inform our understanding of the fundamental properties of dark matter, such as particle mass, self-interaction strength, non-gravitational couplings to the Standard Model, and compact object abundances. Additionally, we discuss the ways that LSST will complement other experiments to strengthen our understanding of the fundamental characteristics of dark matter. More information on the LSST dark matter effort can be found at https://lsstdarkmatter.github.io/ .

Explore related subjects

astro-ph.COastro-ph.GAastro-ph.HEhep-exhep-ph

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Alex Drlica-Wagner, Yao-Yuan Mao, Susmita Adhikari, Robert Armstrong, Arka Banerjee, Nilanjan Banik, Keith Bechtol, Simeon Bird, Kimberly K. Boddy, Ana Bonaca, Jo Bovy, Matthew R. Buckley, Esra Bulbul, Chihway Chang, George Chapline, Johann Cohen-Tanugi, Alessandro Cuoco, Francis-Yan Cyr-Racine, William A. Dawson, Ana Díaz Rivero, Cora Dvorkin, Denis Erkal, Christopher D. Fassnacht, Juan García-Bellido, Maurizio Giannotti, Vera Gluscevic, Nathan Golovich, David Hendel, Yashar D. Hezaveh, Shunsaku Horiuchi, M. James Jee, Manoj Kaplinghat, Charles R. Keeton, Sergey E. Koposov, Casey Y. Lam, Ting S. Li, Jessica R. Lu, Rachel Mandelbaum, Samuel D. McDermott, Mitch McNanna, Michael Medford, Manuel Meyer, Moniez Marc, Simona Murgia, Ethan O. Nadler, Lina Necib, Eric Nuss, Andrew B. Pace, Annika H. G. Peter, Daniel A. Polin, Chanda Prescod-Weinstein, Justin I. Read, Rogerio Rosenfeld, Nora Shipp, Joshua D. Simon, Tracy R. Slatyer, Oscar Straniero, Louis E. Strigari, Erik Tollerud, J. Anthony Tyson, Mei-Yu Wang, Risa H. Wechsler, David Wittman, Hai-Bo Yu, Gabrijela Zaharijas, Yacine Ali-Haïmoud, James Annis, Simon Birrer, Rahul Biswas, Jonathan Blazek, Alyson M. Brooks, Elizabeth Buckley-Geer, Regina Caputo, Eric Charles, Seth Digel, Scott Dodelson, Brenna Flaugher, Joshua Frieman, Eric Gawiser, Andrew P. Hearin, Renee Hložek, Bhuvnesh Jain, Tesla E. Jeltema, Savvas M. Koushiappas, Mariangela Lisanti, Marilena LoVerde, Siddharth Mishra-Sharma, Jeffrey A. Newman, Brian Nord, Erfan Nourbakhsh, Steven Ritz, Brant E. Robertson, Miguel A. Sánchez-Conde, Anže Slosar, Tim M. P. Tait, Aprajita Verma, Ricardo Vilalta, Christopher W. Walter, Brian Yanny, Andrew R. Zentner. 2019-02-04. Probing the Fundamental Nature of Dark Matter with the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope. https://arxiv.org/abs/1902.01055

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Constraining spinning primordial black holes with interstellar dust heating

Primordial black holes (PBHs) are a well-motivated dark matter candidate, and their cosmic abundance is constrained by a variety of observational probes. PBHs in the mass range $10^{15}\,\text{g}\,{-}\,10^{17}\,\text{g}$ are evaporating today via Hawking radiation, a process that can heat interstellar dust and modify its thermal emission. Recent studies have used this effect to place constraints on the abundance of non-spinning PBHs. We extend this approach by investigating the influence of PBH spin on dust-heating constraints. Furthermore, we account for secondary photons that originate not only from the decay of gauge bosons but also from the decay of hadrons produced via the fragmentation of primary quarks and gluons emitted through Hawking radiation. By comparing the dust heating rate induced by spinning PBHs with the maximum cooling rate of dust, considering both silicate and graphite grains, we derive new upper limits on the fraction of dark matter in the form of PBHs, $f_{\rm PBH}$. Our results show that the constraints depend on both PBH mass and spin. Smaller PBHs with higher spin yield stronger limits. For example, in the cases we investigated, the strongest constraint is $f_{\rm PBH} \sim 1.5 \times 10^{-4}$ for $M_{\rm PBH} = 10^{15}{\rm g}$ and spin parameter $a_{*} = 0.9999$. Although these limits are less stringent than existing constraints in the same mass range, they provide a distinct and complementary approach to constraining the abundance of PBHs.

astro-ph.CO↗
arXiv2026

Two-parameter continuous deformation of Starobinsky inflation as a bridge between Planck and ACT DESI data with $N_\star\in(50,60)$

We present a family of plateau-type inflationary potentials, eq.~\eqref{Vgeneral}, and analyze a two-parameter $\alpha\beta$-Starobinsky specialization that interpolates continuously between a \emph{maximal} plateau ($V\!\to\!V_0$) and a \emph{submaximal} plateau ($V\!\to\!V_\infty 0$ with $x_\star\gg 1/\beta$ the slow-roll scaling laws change to $n_s\simeq 1-\frac{4}{3N_\star},\, r\simeq\mathcal{C}(\alpha,\beta)\,N_\star^{-4/3},$ with an explicit coefficient $\mathcal{C}(\alpha,\beta)$ set by the plateau truncation. This deformation lifts $n_s$ at fixed $N_\star$ while further suppressing $r$, reconciling the Planck~2018 constraint $n_s=0.9649\pm0.0042$ (68\% CL) and BICEP/Keck18 data $r_{0.05}<0.036$ (95\% CL), with the higher central values $n_s\sim0.97$--$0.98$ preferred by ACT+DESI~DR2 (BAO), within the theoretically motivated interval $N_\star\in(50,60)$ and without exotic reheating. We provide an exact identity for $V/V'$ enabling analytic control of $N_\star$, a practical crossover criterion $\beta\,x_\star\ll1$ vs.\ $\gg1$, and a transparent mapping between $(\alpha,\beta)$ and the observables $(n_s,r,N_\star)$. These yield sharp, testable signatures, particularly the softened $N_\star$-scaling of $r$, that distinguish a maximal from a submaximal plateau with upcoming CMB and LSS data.

astro-ph.CO↗
arXiv2026

A Tale of Two Gauges: Effective Field Theory for Relativistic Behavior of Cosmological Axions

In this work, we present a formalism to model the relativistic behavior of axions. The relativistic behavior of axions is surprisingly difficult to model precisely, as it involves oscillations on timescales much shorter than the Hubble timescale. To overcome this challenge, one typically resorts to some form of effective treatment, focusing only on the time-averaged description of the exact oscillations. Salehian, Namjoo & Kaiser provide a systematic framework for such treatment, based on the effective field theory formalism. While the aforementioned study was formulated for axion perturbations in the Newtonian gauge with no anisotropic stress, we extend the formalism to the synchronous gauge that is more conventionally used for numerical implementation in a realistic cosmological setting. Unlike their work, however, we propose a fluid interpretation in which the axion field can be identified as a perfect fluid at all times, both in the exact and effective regimes. Moreover, we present the effective field theory for the Newtonian gauge with non-zero anisotropic stress, making the original formulation more general and useful for scenarios where the matter content of the universe is multi-component. These results lay the theoretical foundation for a companion paper where we discuss how the axion field should be incorporated alongside other species in common cosmological Boltzmann solvers.

astro-ph.CO↗